Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories : Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality. / Boye, Kasper.

In: Linguistic Discovery, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2010, p. 4-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Boye, K 2010, 'Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality', Linguistic Discovery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4-22.

APA

Boye, K. (2010). Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality. Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 4-22.

Vancouver

Boye K. Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality. Linguistic Discovery. 2010;8(1):4-22.

Author

Boye, Kasper. / Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories : Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality. In: Linguistic Discovery. 2010 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 4-22.

Bibtex

@article{c141b370f91911ddb219000ea68e967b,
title = "Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality",
abstract = "Cross-linguistic generic categories like evidentiality, tense, aspect, number, and person are entrenched in linguistic theory. However, it is not clear whether there is much empirical substance to them. There is a remarkable lack of criteria for what counts as a category. This paper tries to show that semantic maps can be used to give empirical substance to claims about cross-linguistic generic categories. It is argued that, as falsifiable cross-linguistic generalizations, semantic maps provide us with a criterion for categorial status and category membership and also provide us with a basis for identifying relations between different categories. However, it is also argued that there are limits to the use of semantic maps in evaluating claims about cross-linguistic generic categories, and that the criterion for categorial status and category membership provided by semantic maps ultimately needs to be supplemented by other criteria. In its argumentation, this paper focuses on the category of evidentiality and on the relation between evidentiality and epistemic modality.",
author = "Kasper Boye",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "4--22",
journal = "Linguistic Discovery",
issn = "1537-0852",
publisher = "Dartmouth College Library",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories

T2 - Evidentiality and its relation to Epistemic Modality

AU - Boye, Kasper

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Cross-linguistic generic categories like evidentiality, tense, aspect, number, and person are entrenched in linguistic theory. However, it is not clear whether there is much empirical substance to them. There is a remarkable lack of criteria for what counts as a category. This paper tries to show that semantic maps can be used to give empirical substance to claims about cross-linguistic generic categories. It is argued that, as falsifiable cross-linguistic generalizations, semantic maps provide us with a criterion for categorial status and category membership and also provide us with a basis for identifying relations between different categories. However, it is also argued that there are limits to the use of semantic maps in evaluating claims about cross-linguistic generic categories, and that the criterion for categorial status and category membership provided by semantic maps ultimately needs to be supplemented by other criteria. In its argumentation, this paper focuses on the category of evidentiality and on the relation between evidentiality and epistemic modality.

AB - Cross-linguistic generic categories like evidentiality, tense, aspect, number, and person are entrenched in linguistic theory. However, it is not clear whether there is much empirical substance to them. There is a remarkable lack of criteria for what counts as a category. This paper tries to show that semantic maps can be used to give empirical substance to claims about cross-linguistic generic categories. It is argued that, as falsifiable cross-linguistic generalizations, semantic maps provide us with a criterion for categorial status and category membership and also provide us with a basis for identifying relations between different categories. However, it is also argued that there are limits to the use of semantic maps in evaluating claims about cross-linguistic generic categories, and that the criterion for categorial status and category membership provided by semantic maps ultimately needs to be supplemented by other criteria. In its argumentation, this paper focuses on the category of evidentiality and on the relation between evidentiality and epistemic modality.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 4

EP - 22

JO - Linguistic Discovery

JF - Linguistic Discovery

SN - 1537-0852

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 10487855