Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Seeing the Forest for the Trees : Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration. / Daniels, Steven E.; Emborg, Jens; Walker, Gregg B.
In: Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 6, No. (Special Issue 1), 2012.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Seeing the Forest for the Trees
T2 - Managing Social Conflict and Forest Restoration
AU - Daniels, Steven E.
AU - Emborg, Jens
AU - Walker, Gregg B.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This paper examines the role that social conflict is likely to play in forest restoration projects. A definition of conflict as “perceived goalinterference among interdependent parties” serves as a point of departure for the discussion, and the nature of forest restoration conflict issystematically examined by focusing on each aspect of the definition: perceptions, goal interference, the parties, and their interdependence.Agencies undertaking restoration projects are encouraged to adopt a discourse orientation, wherein they recognize that 1) their publicinvolvement efforts are creating a discourse that can incorporate a wide array of values and voices and 2) groups may create competingdiscourses if they feel that the agency’s process disenfranchises them.
AB - This paper examines the role that social conflict is likely to play in forest restoration projects. A definition of conflict as “perceived goalinterference among interdependent parties” serves as a point of departure for the discussion, and the nature of forest restoration conflict issystematically examined by focusing on each aspect of the definition: perceptions, goal interference, the parties, and their interdependence.Agencies undertaking restoration projects are encouraged to adopt a discourse orientation, wherein they recognize that 1) their publicinvolvement efforts are creating a discourse that can incorporate a wide array of values and voices and 2) groups may create competingdiscourses if they feel that the agency’s process disenfranchises them.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 6
JO - Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology
JF - Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology
SN - 1752-3753
IS - (Special Issue 1)
ER -
ID: 242413485