Reference group influences and campaign exposure effects on rhino horn demand: Qualitative insights from Vietnam
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Reference group influences and campaign exposure effects on rhino horn demand : Qualitative insights from Vietnam. / Dang, Vu Hoai Nam; Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl.
In: People and Nature , Vol. 2, No. 4, 2020, p. 923-939.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reference group influences and campaign exposure effects on rhino horn demand
T2 - Qualitative insights from Vietnam
AU - Dang, Vu Hoai Nam
AU - Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt
AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
N1 - Special Features: Consuming wildlife – managing demand for products in the wildlife trade & Managing forest regeneration and expansion at a time of unprecedented global change
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - While considerable effort is invested in rhino horn demand reduction campaigns, it is unclear to what extent users are exposed to and accept the messages in these ads. We investigate recall as an indicator of exposure and the influence of different reference groups by conducting 50 semi‐structured interviews with self‐reported rhino horn users in Hanoi using an interpretative thematic analysis. The decision to buy or use rhino horn was almost exclusively influenced by peers with perceived expertise using rhino horn, whereas commonly used deliverers of such campaigns—traditional medicine practitioners, doctors, government officials, business leaders and celebrities—had very little influence. Campaign exposure was relatively high, but campaign influence low as consumers considered recent demand reduction campaigns and the reference groups delivering the message as well as the implementing organizations unreliable and driven by profit. Willingness to sign a pledge to refrain from buying, using or gifting rhino horn encouraged by employers or association was relatively high. However, the majority of respondents stated they would not comply with this pledge. Case studies of users or their next of kin having experienced negative or no effect of rhino horn were suggested possibly effective in reducing demand by consumers themselves. To increase the acceptance of demand reduction campaigns, organizations could consider forgoing their own branding to reduce distrust in the target audience.We highlight the importance of conducting formative research using both quantitative and qualitative methods based on interviews with actual rhino horn users. While qualitative studies of motivations by confirmed users entail the risk that they retrospectively explain motivations in order to appear internally consistent with their usage of the product, it provides valuable insight into their self‐image and thereby options for affecting their behaviour.
AB - While considerable effort is invested in rhino horn demand reduction campaigns, it is unclear to what extent users are exposed to and accept the messages in these ads. We investigate recall as an indicator of exposure and the influence of different reference groups by conducting 50 semi‐structured interviews with self‐reported rhino horn users in Hanoi using an interpretative thematic analysis. The decision to buy or use rhino horn was almost exclusively influenced by peers with perceived expertise using rhino horn, whereas commonly used deliverers of such campaigns—traditional medicine practitioners, doctors, government officials, business leaders and celebrities—had very little influence. Campaign exposure was relatively high, but campaign influence low as consumers considered recent demand reduction campaigns and the reference groups delivering the message as well as the implementing organizations unreliable and driven by profit. Willingness to sign a pledge to refrain from buying, using or gifting rhino horn encouraged by employers or association was relatively high. However, the majority of respondents stated they would not comply with this pledge. Case studies of users or their next of kin having experienced negative or no effect of rhino horn were suggested possibly effective in reducing demand by consumers themselves. To increase the acceptance of demand reduction campaigns, organizations could consider forgoing their own branding to reduce distrust in the target audience.We highlight the importance of conducting formative research using both quantitative and qualitative methods based on interviews with actual rhino horn users. While qualitative studies of motivations by confirmed users entail the risk that they retrospectively explain motivations in order to appear internally consistent with their usage of the product, it provides valuable insight into their self‐image and thereby options for affecting their behaviour.
U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10121
DO - 10.1002/pan3.10121
M3 - Journal article
VL - 2
SP - 923
EP - 939
JO - People and Nature
JF - People and Nature
SN - 2575-8314
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 244564336