Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma With Intermediate Prognosis: The UNFOLDER Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 2.18 MB, PDF document

  • Lorenz Thurner
  • Marita Ziepert
  • Christian Berdel
  • Christian Schmidt
  • Peter Borchmann
  • Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa
  • Andreas Viardot
  • Mathias Witzens-Harig
  • Judith Dierlamm
  • Mathias Haenel
  • Bernd Metzner
  • Gerald Wulf
  • Eva Lengfelder
  • Ulrich B. Keller
  • Norbert Frickhofen
  • Maike Nickelsen
  • Tobias Gaska
  • Frank Griesinger
  • Rolf Mahlberg
  • Reinhard Marks
  • Ofer Shpilberg
  • Hans Walter Lindemann
  • Martin Soekler
  • Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal
  • Michael Kiehl
  • Eva Roemer
  • Martin Bentz
  • Beate Krammer-Steiner
  • Ralf Trappe
  • Brown, Peter de Nully
  • Massimo Federico
  • Francesco Merli
  • Marianne Engelhard
  • Bertram Glass
  • Norbert Schmitz
  • Lorenz Truemper
  • Moritz Bewarder
  • Frank Hartmann
  • Niels Murawski
  • Stephan Stilgenbauer
  • Andreas Rosenwald
  • Bettina Altmann
  • Heinz Schmidberger
  • Jochen Fleckenstein
  • Markus Loeffler
  • Viola Poeschel
  • Gerhard Held
  • German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA)

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).

Original languageEnglish
Article numberE904
JournalHemaSphere
Volume7
Issue number7
Number of pages13
ISSN2572-9241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s).

ID: 397240071