Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit : a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. / Jensen, Martine M.; Marker, Søren; Do, Hien Q.; Barbateskovic, Marija; Perner, Anders; Møller, Morten H.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2021, p. 292-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jensen, MM, Marker, S, Do, HQ, Barbateskovic, M, Perner, A & Møller, MH 2021, 'Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13731

APA

Jensen, M. M., Marker, S., Do, H. Q., Barbateskovic, M., Perner, A., & Møller, M. H. (2021). Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 65(3), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13731

Vancouver

Jensen MM, Marker S, Do HQ, Barbateskovic M, Perner A, Møller MH. Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2021;65(3):292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13731

Author

Jensen, Martine M. ; Marker, Søren ; Do, Hien Q. ; Barbateskovic, Marija ; Perner, Anders ; Møller, Morten H. / Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit : a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2021 ; Vol. 65, No. 3. pp. 292-301.

Bibtex

@article{0332697e80674856a994532238d60be5,
title = "Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis",
abstract = "Background: Critically ill children are at risk of stress-induced gastrointestinal ulceration. Acid suppressants are frequently used in intensive care units even though there is uncertainty about the benefits and harms. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess patient-important benefits and harms of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in children in intensive care. Methods: We conducted the review according to the PRISMA statement, the Cochrane Handbook, and GRADE, using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). We included randomised clinical trials comparing SUP with histamine-2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors vs placebo/no prophylaxis in children admitted for intensive care. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, hospital-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile enteritis, myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury and quality of life. Results: We included a total of seven trials (n = 504) with eight trial comparisons. We found no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-2.37), overt gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.35) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77-1.82) between SUP vs placebo/no prophylaxis. No trials reported on remaining secondary outcomes. TSA was unable to draw firm conclusions for all outcomes and certainty of evidence for all outcomes was “very low.”. Conclusions: We found no difference in all-cause mortality, overt gastrointestinal bleeding or hospital-acquired pneumonia in children in intensive care receiving acid suppressants compared with placebo/no prophylaxis. However, the quantity and quality of evidence was very low with no firm evidence for benefit or harm.",
keywords = "acid suppressants, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, histamine-2-receptor antagonists, intensive care unit, pediatrics, proton pump inhibitors",
author = "Jensen, {Martine M.} and S{\o}ren Marker and Do, {Hien Q.} and Marija Barbateskovic and Anders Perner and M{\o}ller, {Morten H.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1111/aas.13731",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "292--301",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylactic acid suppressants in children in the intensive care unit

T2 - a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

AU - Jensen, Martine M.

AU - Marker, Søren

AU - Do, Hien Q.

AU - Barbateskovic, Marija

AU - Perner, Anders

AU - Møller, Morten H.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Critically ill children are at risk of stress-induced gastrointestinal ulceration. Acid suppressants are frequently used in intensive care units even though there is uncertainty about the benefits and harms. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess patient-important benefits and harms of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in children in intensive care. Methods: We conducted the review according to the PRISMA statement, the Cochrane Handbook, and GRADE, using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). We included randomised clinical trials comparing SUP with histamine-2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors vs placebo/no prophylaxis in children admitted for intensive care. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, hospital-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile enteritis, myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury and quality of life. Results: We included a total of seven trials (n = 504) with eight trial comparisons. We found no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-2.37), overt gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.35) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77-1.82) between SUP vs placebo/no prophylaxis. No trials reported on remaining secondary outcomes. TSA was unable to draw firm conclusions for all outcomes and certainty of evidence for all outcomes was “very low.”. Conclusions: We found no difference in all-cause mortality, overt gastrointestinal bleeding or hospital-acquired pneumonia in children in intensive care receiving acid suppressants compared with placebo/no prophylaxis. However, the quantity and quality of evidence was very low with no firm evidence for benefit or harm.

AB - Background: Critically ill children are at risk of stress-induced gastrointestinal ulceration. Acid suppressants are frequently used in intensive care units even though there is uncertainty about the benefits and harms. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess patient-important benefits and harms of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in children in intensive care. Methods: We conducted the review according to the PRISMA statement, the Cochrane Handbook, and GRADE, using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). We included randomised clinical trials comparing SUP with histamine-2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors vs placebo/no prophylaxis in children admitted for intensive care. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, hospital-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile enteritis, myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury and quality of life. Results: We included a total of seven trials (n = 504) with eight trial comparisons. We found no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-2.37), overt gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.35) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77-1.82) between SUP vs placebo/no prophylaxis. No trials reported on remaining secondary outcomes. TSA was unable to draw firm conclusions for all outcomes and certainty of evidence for all outcomes was “very low.”. Conclusions: We found no difference in all-cause mortality, overt gastrointestinal bleeding or hospital-acquired pneumonia in children in intensive care receiving acid suppressants compared with placebo/no prophylaxis. However, the quantity and quality of evidence was very low with no firm evidence for benefit or harm.

KW - acid suppressants

KW - gastrointestinal hemorrhage

KW - histamine-2-receptor antagonists

KW - intensive care unit

KW - pediatrics

KW - proton pump inhibitors

U2 - 10.1111/aas.13731

DO - 10.1111/aas.13731

M3 - Review

C2 - 33147375

AN - SCOPUS:85096712737

VL - 65

SP - 292

EP - 301

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 280672855