Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language. / Rodríguez, J. Tinguaro; Franco, Camilo; Montero, Javier; Lu, Jie.

Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014 Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014 Proceedings, Part II. ed. / Anne Laurent; Olivier Strauss; Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier; Ronald R. Yager. Springer, 2014. p. 566-575 (Communications in Computer and Information Science; No. 443).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Rodríguez, JT, Franco, C, Montero, J & Lu, J 2014, Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language. in A Laurent, O Strauss, B Bouchon-Meunier & RR Yager (eds), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014 Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014 Proceedings, Part II. Springer, Communications in Computer and Information Science, no. 443, pp. 566-575, International Conference IPMU 2014 (Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems), Montpellier, France, 15/07/2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6

APA

Rodríguez, J. T., Franco, C., Montero, J., & Lu, J. (2014). Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language. In A. Laurent, O. Strauss, B. Bouchon-Meunier, & R. R. Yager (Eds.), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014 Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014 Proceedings, Part II (pp. 566-575). Springer. Communications in Computer and Information Science No. 443 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6

Vancouver

Rodríguez JT, Franco C, Montero J, Lu J. Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language. In Laurent A, Strauss O, Bouchon-Meunier B, Yager RR, editors, Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014 Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014 Proceedings, Part II. Springer. 2014. p. 566-575. (Communications in Computer and Information Science; No. 443). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6

Author

Rodríguez, J. Tinguaro ; Franco, Camilo ; Montero, Javier ; Lu, Jie. / Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014 Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014 Proceedings, Part II. editor / Anne Laurent ; Olivier Strauss ; Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier ; Ronald R. Yager. Springer, 2014. pp. 566-575 (Communications in Computer and Information Science; No. 443).

Bibtex

@inbook{5a836a8e07824195bc9b17bcf0828046,
title = "Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language",
abstract = "The evidence coming from cognitive psychology and linguistics shows that pairs of reference concepts (as e.g. good/bad, tall/short, nice/ugly, etc.) play a crucial role in the way we everyday use and understand natural languages in order to analyze reality and make decisions. Different situations and problems require different pairs of landmark concepts, since they provide the referential semantics in which the available information is understood accordingly to our goals in each context. In this way, a semantic valuation structure or system emerges from a pair of reference concepts and the way they oppose each other. Such structures allow representing the logic of new concepts according to the semantics of the references. We will refer to these semantic valuation structures as paired structures. Our point is that the semantic features of a paired structure could essentially depend on the semantic relationships holding between the pair of reference concepts from which the valuation structure emerges. Different relationships may enable the representation of different types of neutrality, understood here as an epistemic hesitation regarding the references. However, the standard approach to natural languages through logical models usually assumes that reference concepts are just each other complement. In this paper, we informally discuss more deeply about these issues, claiming in a positional manner that an adequate logical study and representation of the features and complexity of natural languages requires to consider more general semantic relationships between references.",
author = "Rodr{\'i}guez, {J. Tinguaro} and Camilo Franco and Javier Montero and Jie Lu",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-08854-9",
series = "Communications in Computer and Information Science",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "443",
pages = "566--575",
editor = "Anne Laurent and Olivier Strauss and Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier and Yager, {Ronald R.}",
booktitle = "Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems",
address = "Switzerland",
note = "null ; Conference date: 15-07-2014 Through 19-07-2014",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Paired structures in logical and semiotic models of natural language

AU - Rodríguez, J. Tinguaro

AU - Franco, Camilo

AU - Montero, Javier

AU - Lu, Jie

N1 - Conference code: 15

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The evidence coming from cognitive psychology and linguistics shows that pairs of reference concepts (as e.g. good/bad, tall/short, nice/ugly, etc.) play a crucial role in the way we everyday use and understand natural languages in order to analyze reality and make decisions. Different situations and problems require different pairs of landmark concepts, since they provide the referential semantics in which the available information is understood accordingly to our goals in each context. In this way, a semantic valuation structure or system emerges from a pair of reference concepts and the way they oppose each other. Such structures allow representing the logic of new concepts according to the semantics of the references. We will refer to these semantic valuation structures as paired structures. Our point is that the semantic features of a paired structure could essentially depend on the semantic relationships holding between the pair of reference concepts from which the valuation structure emerges. Different relationships may enable the representation of different types of neutrality, understood here as an epistemic hesitation regarding the references. However, the standard approach to natural languages through logical models usually assumes that reference concepts are just each other complement. In this paper, we informally discuss more deeply about these issues, claiming in a positional manner that an adequate logical study and representation of the features and complexity of natural languages requires to consider more general semantic relationships between references.

AB - The evidence coming from cognitive psychology and linguistics shows that pairs of reference concepts (as e.g. good/bad, tall/short, nice/ugly, etc.) play a crucial role in the way we everyday use and understand natural languages in order to analyze reality and make decisions. Different situations and problems require different pairs of landmark concepts, since they provide the referential semantics in which the available information is understood accordingly to our goals in each context. In this way, a semantic valuation structure or system emerges from a pair of reference concepts and the way they oppose each other. Such structures allow representing the logic of new concepts according to the semantics of the references. We will refer to these semantic valuation structures as paired structures. Our point is that the semantic features of a paired structure could essentially depend on the semantic relationships holding between the pair of reference concepts from which the valuation structure emerges. Different relationships may enable the representation of different types of neutrality, understood here as an epistemic hesitation regarding the references. However, the standard approach to natural languages through logical models usually assumes that reference concepts are just each other complement. In this paper, we informally discuss more deeply about these issues, claiming in a positional manner that an adequate logical study and representation of the features and complexity of natural languages requires to consider more general semantic relationships between references.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-319-08854-9

T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science

SP - 566

EP - 575

BT - Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems

A2 - Laurent, Anne

A2 - Strauss, Olivier

A2 - Bouchon-Meunier, Bernadette

A2 - Yager, Ronald R.

PB - Springer

Y2 - 15 July 2014 through 19 July 2014

ER -

ID: 120182228