Measuring speaking rate: How do objective measurements correlate with audio-perceptual ratings?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Measuring speaking rate: How do objective measurements correlate with audio-perceptual ratings? / Iwarsson, Jenny; Næs, Josefine; Nielsen, Rikke Hollen.
In: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring speaking rate:
T2 - How do objective measurements correlate with audio-perceptual ratings?
AU - Iwarsson, Jenny
AU - Næs, Josefine
AU - Nielsen, Rikke Hollen
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - ObjectiveAlthough speaking rate is central for many speech disorders, no consensus exists regarding the measurement of this feature. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlations between perceptual listener evaluations and various measures of speaking rate. Furthermore, the study investigated the relationship between speaking rate and articulation rate and how pauses in speech affect the perceived tempo.MethodNine healthy females were selected to produce stimuli representing three habitual speech tempi during semi-spontaneous speech: slow (n = 3), neutral (n = 3) and fast (n = 3). Speaking rate was analyzed both by manual calculation and through automatic detection by a script to the computer-based program Praat. Thirty untrained male and female listeners evaluated the recordings with regard to speech tempo on visual analogue scales from very slow to very fast.ResultsLarge, significant correlations (Pearson’s r) were found between all objective measures of speaking rate and perceptual listener evaluations. Words/minute showed the largest correlation (.91), followed by syllables/second (.89), while articulation rate (pauses excluded) as automatically measured by the script, showed the smallest correlation (.69). Possible explanations for the findings are discussed.ConclusionUntrained listeners’ evaluation of speech tempo in normal subjects correlated strongly with objective measurements. The results both support the use of auditive-perceptual evaluation of tempo and the use of automatic script analysis for clinical use. Speaking rate (pauses included) showed better consistency with perceptual listener evaluations than articulation rate.
AB - ObjectiveAlthough speaking rate is central for many speech disorders, no consensus exists regarding the measurement of this feature. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlations between perceptual listener evaluations and various measures of speaking rate. Furthermore, the study investigated the relationship between speaking rate and articulation rate and how pauses in speech affect the perceived tempo.MethodNine healthy females were selected to produce stimuli representing three habitual speech tempi during semi-spontaneous speech: slow (n = 3), neutral (n = 3) and fast (n = 3). Speaking rate was analyzed both by manual calculation and through automatic detection by a script to the computer-based program Praat. Thirty untrained male and female listeners evaluated the recordings with regard to speech tempo on visual analogue scales from very slow to very fast.ResultsLarge, significant correlations (Pearson’s r) were found between all objective measures of speaking rate and perceptual listener evaluations. Words/minute showed the largest correlation (.91), followed by syllables/second (.89), while articulation rate (pauses excluded) as automatically measured by the script, showed the smallest correlation (.69). Possible explanations for the findings are discussed.ConclusionUntrained listeners’ evaluation of speech tempo in normal subjects correlated strongly with objective measurements. The results both support the use of auditive-perceptual evaluation of tempo and the use of automatic script analysis for clinical use. Speaking rate (pauses included) showed better consistency with perceptual listener evaluations than articulation rate.
U2 - 10.1080/14015439.2021.1988702
DO - 10.1080/14015439.2021.1988702
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34672858
JO - Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
JF - Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
SN - 1401-5439
ER -
ID: 287695796