Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan for Patients With Isolated Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial (the SCANDIUM Trial)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan for Patients With Isolated Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases : A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial (the SCANDIUM Trial). / Olofsson Bagge, Roger; Nelson, Axel; Shafazand, Amir; All-Eriksson, Charlotta; Cahlin, Christian; Elander, Nils; Helgadottir, Hildur; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke; Kinhult, Sara; Ljuslinder, Ingrid; Mattsson, Jan; Rizell, Magnus; Sternby Eilard, Malin; Ullenhag, Gustav J.; Nilsson, Jonas A.; Ny, Lars; Lindnér, Per.
In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 41, No. 16, 2023, p. 3042-3050.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan for Patients With Isolated Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases
T2 - A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial (the SCANDIUM Trial)
AU - Olofsson Bagge, Roger
AU - Nelson, Axel
AU - Shafazand, Amir
AU - All-Eriksson, Charlotta
AU - Cahlin, Christian
AU - Elander, Nils
AU - Helgadottir, Hildur
AU - Kiilgaard, Jens Folke
AU - Kinhult, Sara
AU - Ljuslinder, Ingrid
AU - Mattsson, Jan
AU - Rizell, Magnus
AU - Sternby Eilard, Malin
AU - Ullenhag, Gustav J.
AU - Nilsson, Jonas A.
AU - Ny, Lars
AU - Lindnér, Per
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - PURPOSEAbout half of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma present with isolated liver metastasis, in whom the median survival is 6-12 months. The few systemic treatment options available only moderately prolong survival. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a regional treatment option, but prospective efficacy and safety data are lacking.METHODSIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, patients with previously untreated isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive a one-time treatment with IHP with melphalan or best alternative care (control group). The primary end point was overall survival at 24 months. Here, we report the secondary outcomes of response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety.RESULTSNinety-three patients were randomly assigned, and 87 patients were assigned to either IHP (n = 43) or a control group receiving the investigator's choice of treatment (n = 44). In the control group, 49% received chemotherapy, 39% immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 9% locoregional treatment other than IHP. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 40% versus 4.5% in the IHP and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). The median PFS was 7.4 months versus 3.3 months (P <.0001), with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.36), and the median hPFS was 9.1 months versus 3.3 months (P <.0001), both favoring the IHP arm. There were 11 treatment-related serious adverse events in the IHP group compared with seven in the control group. There was one treatment-related death in the IHP group.CONCLUSIONIHP treatment resulted in superior ORR, hPFS, and PFS compared with best alternative care in previously untreated patients with isolated liver metastases from primary uveal melanoma.
AB - PURPOSEAbout half of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma present with isolated liver metastasis, in whom the median survival is 6-12 months. The few systemic treatment options available only moderately prolong survival. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a regional treatment option, but prospective efficacy and safety data are lacking.METHODSIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, patients with previously untreated isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive a one-time treatment with IHP with melphalan or best alternative care (control group). The primary end point was overall survival at 24 months. Here, we report the secondary outcomes of response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety.RESULTSNinety-three patients were randomly assigned, and 87 patients were assigned to either IHP (n = 43) or a control group receiving the investigator's choice of treatment (n = 44). In the control group, 49% received chemotherapy, 39% immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 9% locoregional treatment other than IHP. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 40% versus 4.5% in the IHP and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). The median PFS was 7.4 months versus 3.3 months (P <.0001), with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.36), and the median hPFS was 9.1 months versus 3.3 months (P <.0001), both favoring the IHP arm. There were 11 treatment-related serious adverse events in the IHP group compared with seven in the control group. There was one treatment-related death in the IHP group.CONCLUSIONIHP treatment resulted in superior ORR, hPFS, and PFS compared with best alternative care in previously untreated patients with isolated liver metastases from primary uveal melanoma.
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.22.01705
DO - 10.1200/JCO.22.01705
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36940407
AN - SCOPUS:85160458547
VL - 41
SP - 3042
EP - 3050
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
SN - 0732-183X
IS - 16
ER -
ID: 369353916