How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework. / Teo, Sue Anne.

In: Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2022, p. 216-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Teo, SA 2022, 'How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework', Nordic Journal of Human Rights, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078

APA

Teo, S. A. (2022). How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 40(1), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078

Vancouver

Teo SA. How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework. Nordic Journal of Human Rights. 2022;40(1):216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078

Author

Teo, Sue Anne. / How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework. In: Nordic Journal of Human Rights. 2022 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 216-234.

Bibtex

@article{746e88072758456f9401bee3fa701086,
title = "How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework",
abstract = "Few recent developments have captured the human imagination as much as those within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The increasing pervasiveness and ubiquity of AI affect both individual lives and society at large. Yet the human rights concerns raised in connection to AI have primarily concentrated around infringements of enumerated discrete rights, such as to privacy, non-discrimination, and freedom of expression and information. While it is important to examine the discrete rights under threat, a fundamental disconnect is present at the foundational level between human rights and AI, because AI systems increasingly challenge the notions of how, by whom, and what human rights violations are being committed. This paper takes a problem-finding perspective and argues that the conceptual foundations of the human rights protection framework are facing a serious challenge. The legal-positivist framing of the discrete rights themselves is examined through an analysis of the misaligned harm typology between the objects of human rights protection and the threats posed by AI systems. The paper highlights three main misalignments, from the perspective of saliency, temporality, and causality of harms, and argues that these misalignments challenge the structural enabling conditions for the exercise and meaningful protection of human rights.",
author = "Teo, {Sue Anne}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "216--234",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1891-8131",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Scandinavia",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Artificial Intelligence Systems Challenge the Conceptual Foundations of the Human Rights Legal Framework

AU - Teo, Sue Anne

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Few recent developments have captured the human imagination as much as those within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The increasing pervasiveness and ubiquity of AI affect both individual lives and society at large. Yet the human rights concerns raised in connection to AI have primarily concentrated around infringements of enumerated discrete rights, such as to privacy, non-discrimination, and freedom of expression and information. While it is important to examine the discrete rights under threat, a fundamental disconnect is present at the foundational level between human rights and AI, because AI systems increasingly challenge the notions of how, by whom, and what human rights violations are being committed. This paper takes a problem-finding perspective and argues that the conceptual foundations of the human rights protection framework are facing a serious challenge. The legal-positivist framing of the discrete rights themselves is examined through an analysis of the misaligned harm typology between the objects of human rights protection and the threats posed by AI systems. The paper highlights three main misalignments, from the perspective of saliency, temporality, and causality of harms, and argues that these misalignments challenge the structural enabling conditions for the exercise and meaningful protection of human rights.

AB - Few recent developments have captured the human imagination as much as those within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The increasing pervasiveness and ubiquity of AI affect both individual lives and society at large. Yet the human rights concerns raised in connection to AI have primarily concentrated around infringements of enumerated discrete rights, such as to privacy, non-discrimination, and freedom of expression and information. While it is important to examine the discrete rights under threat, a fundamental disconnect is present at the foundational level between human rights and AI, because AI systems increasingly challenge the notions of how, by whom, and what human rights violations are being committed. This paper takes a problem-finding perspective and argues that the conceptual foundations of the human rights protection framework are facing a serious challenge. The legal-positivist framing of the discrete rights themselves is examined through an analysis of the misaligned harm typology between the objects of human rights protection and the threats posed by AI systems. The paper highlights three main misalignments, from the perspective of saliency, temporality, and causality of harms, and argues that these misalignments challenge the structural enabling conditions for the exercise and meaningful protection of human rights.

U2 - 10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078

DO - 10.1080/18918131.2022.2073078

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 216

EP - 234

JO - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

JF - Nordic Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1891-8131

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 310389442