Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Jacob Lønborg
  • Engstrøm, Thomas
  • Henning Kelbæk
  • Steffen Helqvist
  • Lene Kløvgaard
  • Holmvang, Lene
  • Frants Pedersen
  • Erik Jørgensen
  • Kari Saunamäki
  • Peter Clemmensen
  • Ole De Backer
  • Jan Ravkilde
  • Hans-Henrik Tilsted
  • Anton Boel Villadsen
  • Jens Aarøe
  • Svend Eggert Jensen
  • Bent Raungaard
  • Køber, Lars Valeur
  • Dan Eik Høfsten
  • DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Investigators

BACKGROUND: The impact of disease severity on the outcome after complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is uncertain. The objective of this post hoc study was to evaluate the impact of number of diseased vessel, lesion location, and severity of the noninfarct-related stenosis on the effect of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization.

METHODS AND RESULTS: In the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI study (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization), we randomized 627 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients to fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization or infarct-related percutaneous coronary intervention only. In patients with 3-vessel disease, fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization reduced the primary end point (all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.64; P=0.001), with no significant effect in patients with 2-vessel disease (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47-1.26; P=0.29; P for interaction =0.046). A similar effect was observed in patients with diameter stenosis ≥90% of noninfarct-related arteries (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.62; P=0.001), but not in patients with less severe lesions (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.44-1.19; P=0.21; P for interaction =0.06). The effect was most pronounced in patients with 3-vessel disease and noninfarct-related stenoses ≥90%, and in this subgroup, there was a nonsignificant reduction in the end point of mortality and reinfarction (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-1.32; P=0.09). Proximal versus distal location did not influence the benefit from complete revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS: The benefit from fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease was dependent on the presence of 3-vessel disease and noninfarct diameter stenosis ≥90% and was particularly pronounced in patients with both of these angiographic characteristics.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01960933.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere004460
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume10
Issue number4
Number of pages27
ISSN1941-7640
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis, Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial/physiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Revascularization/methods, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods, Prognosis, Recovery of Function/physiology, Retrospective Studies, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

ID: 196004276