Fighting status inequalities: non-domination vs non-interference
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Fighting status inequalities : non-domination vs non-interference. / Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul; Landes, Xavier.
In: Public Health Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2016, p. 155-163.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fighting status inequalities
T2 - non-domination vs non-interference
AU - Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul
AU - Landes, Xavier
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Status inequalities seem to play a fairly big role in creating inequalities in health. This article assumes that there can be good reasons to fight status inequalities in order to reduce inequalities in health. It examines whether the neorepublican ideal of non-dominance does a better job as a theoretical foil for this as compared to a liberal notion of non-interference. The article concludes that there is a prima facie case for incorporating non-dominance into our thinking about public health, but that it needs to go hand in hand with a more traditional liberal ideal of non-interference.
AB - Status inequalities seem to play a fairly big role in creating inequalities in health. This article assumes that there can be good reasons to fight status inequalities in order to reduce inequalities in health. It examines whether the neorepublican ideal of non-dominance does a better job as a theoretical foil for this as compared to a liberal notion of non-interference. The article concludes that there is a prima facie case for incorporating non-dominance into our thinking about public health, but that it needs to go hand in hand with a more traditional liberal ideal of non-interference.
U2 - 10.1093/phe/phv029
DO - 10.1093/phe/phv029
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27551298
VL - 9
SP - 155
EP - 163
JO - Public Health Ethics
JF - Public Health Ethics
SN - 1754-9973
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 146337294