Feasts gone wrong. French gastronomical Discourse and literary Counter-models from Rabelais to Perec
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Feasts gone wrong. French gastronomical Discourse and literary Counter-models from Rabelais to Perec. / Meiner, Carsten.
In: Food and History, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2022, p. 87-107.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasts gone wrong. French gastronomical Discourse and literary Counter-models from Rabelais to Perec
AU - Meiner, Carsten
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Since the seventeenth century, a powerful gastronomical discourse has continuously affirmed the superiority of French gastronomy. The overall argument of this article is that French literature can be considered a critical counter-discourse to the normativity of French gastronomy. French literature, it is argued, de-mythologizes and re-historicizes gastronomical norms and ideals in order to critically examine the political, moral, or gender-related consequences of living in a culture of gastronomical self-idealization. This manifestly ambitious claim is sustained by a methodological concept: the double literary topos. This notion subsumes how French literature stages the conventional and normative dimensions of feasts, and at the same time addresses historically specific critiques of the very normativity of feasts. The article highlights a specific topos – “feasts gone wrong” – used by French literature, from Molière to Houellebecq, to address the moral, psychological and political consequences of living in a culture of normative and self-idealizing gastronomy.
AB - Since the seventeenth century, a powerful gastronomical discourse has continuously affirmed the superiority of French gastronomy. The overall argument of this article is that French literature can be considered a critical counter-discourse to the normativity of French gastronomy. French literature, it is argued, de-mythologizes and re-historicizes gastronomical norms and ideals in order to critically examine the political, moral, or gender-related consequences of living in a culture of gastronomical self-idealization. This manifestly ambitious claim is sustained by a methodological concept: the double literary topos. This notion subsumes how French literature stages the conventional and normative dimensions of feasts, and at the same time addresses historically specific critiques of the very normativity of feasts. The article highlights a specific topos – “feasts gone wrong” – used by French literature, from Molière to Houellebecq, to address the moral, psychological and political consequences of living in a culture of normative and self-idealizing gastronomy.
U2 - 10.1484/J.FOOD.5.131742
DO - 10.1484/J.FOOD.5.131742
M3 - Journal article
VL - 20
SP - 87
EP - 107
JO - Food and History
JF - Food and History
SN - 1780-3187
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 298638735