Echogenic Surface Enhancements for Improving Needle Visualization in Ultrasound: A PRISMA Systematic Review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Echogenic Surface Enhancements for Improving Needle Visualization in Ultrasound : A PRISMA Systematic Review. / Hovgesen, Caroline Harder; Wilhjelm, Jens E.; Vilmann, Peter; Kalaitzakis, Evangelos.
In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2022, p. 311-325.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Echogenic Surface Enhancements for Improving Needle Visualization in Ultrasound
T2 - A PRISMA Systematic Review
AU - Hovgesen, Caroline Harder
AU - Wilhjelm, Jens E.
AU - Vilmann, Peter
AU - Kalaitzakis, Evangelos
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Optimal visualization of needles in clinical ultrasound imaging is important and challenging, especially at steep angles. Improvement of visualization has been attempted with various techniques, for example, coatings and dimples. This systematic review summarizes enhancement techniques and identifies superior echogenic surface enhancements. Twenty-four papers were identified providing visibility measures for 33 different echogenic needles. These were grouped according to surface characteristics and ranked. Echogenic needles ranked higher than standard needles especially at steeper angles. Among the echogenic needles, coated needles were seemingly better visualized “in vivo” than noncoated needles, despite heterogeneity in study conditions. No unambiguous comparison revealed which needle was best visualized.
AB - Optimal visualization of needles in clinical ultrasound imaging is important and challenging, especially at steep angles. Improvement of visualization has been attempted with various techniques, for example, coatings and dimples. This systematic review summarizes enhancement techniques and identifies superior echogenic surface enhancements. Twenty-four papers were identified providing visibility measures for 33 different echogenic needles. These were grouped according to surface characteristics and ranked. Echogenic needles ranked higher than standard needles especially at steeper angles. Among the echogenic needles, coated needles were seemingly better visualized “in vivo” than noncoated needles, despite heterogeneity in study conditions. No unambiguous comparison revealed which needle was best visualized.
U2 - 10.1002/jum.15713
DO - 10.1002/jum.15713
M3 - Review
C2 - 33870532
AN - SCOPUS:85104389452
VL - 41
SP - 311
EP - 325
JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
SN - 0278-4297
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 302063502