Drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in patients with st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: eight-month follow-up in the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Henning Kelbaek
  • Leif Thuesen
  • Steffen Helqvist
  • Peter Clemmensen
  • Lene Kløvgaard
  • Anne Kaltoft
  • Bente Andersen
  • Helle Thuesen
  • Engstrøm, Thomas
  • Hans E Bøtker
  • Kari Saunamäki
  • Lars R Krusell
  • Erik Jørgensen
  • Hans-Henrik T Hansen
  • Evald H Christiansen
  • Jan Ravkilde
  • Køber, Lars Valeur
  • Kofoed, Klaus Fuglsang
  • Christian J Terkelsen
  • Jens F Lassen
  • DEDICATION Investigators
BACKGROUND: Implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) limits the rate of coronary restenosis in most patients with coronary artery disease, but data are scarce with regard to their use in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and in connection with distal protection of the microvascular perfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 626 patients referred within 12 hours from symptom onset of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction to have a DES or a bare metal stent implanted in the infarct-related lesion with or without distal protection during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed during the index treatment and 8 months later. The primary end point was loss of the lumen diameter in the infarct-related lesion induced by neointimal proliferation. Patients were comparable with regard to baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics. The mean late lumen loss was significantly lower in patients treated with a DES (0.06 mm; SD, 0.66 mm) than in patients who had a bare metal stent implanted (0.47 mm; SD, 0.69 mm; P<0.001). The rate of the composite end point of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization was 8.6% in the DES group versus 14.4% in the bare metal stent group (P=0.03). Cardiac death occurred in 4.2% and 1.6% of the patients (P=0.09) and stent thrombosis occurred in 2.0% and 2.6% (P=0.72), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of DES improves the angiographic outcome and need for repeat revascularization without increasing the short-term risk of stent thrombosis but has a tendency to increase cardiac death in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation
Volume118
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1155-62
Number of pages7
ISSN0009-7322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Bibliographical note

Keywords: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima

ID: 17395265