Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of ISSI 2005 : : 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics
Number of pages5
Volume1
Publication date2005
Pages242-246
ISBN (Print)9789171403391
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes
Event10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005 - Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: 24 Jul 200528 Jul 2005

Conference

Conference10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005
LandSweden
ByStockholm
Periode24/07/200528/07/2005
SponsorThe Swedish Research Council, VINNOVA, Karolinska insititute, Umeå University, Eugene Garfield foundation, et al, VINNOVA, Umea university

ID: 160529094