Development of a type 2 diabetes risk model from a panel of serum biomarkers from the Inter99 cohort

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Janice A Kolberg
  • Torben Jørgensen
  • Robert W Gerwien
  • Sarah Hamren
  • Michael P McKenna
  • Edward Moler
  • Michael W Rowe
  • Mickey S Urdea
  • Xiaomei M Xu
  • Torben Hansen
  • Pedersen, Oluf Borbye
  • Knut Borch-Johnsen
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a model for assessing the 5-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes from a panel of 64 circulating candidate biomarkers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects were selected from the Inter99 cohort, a longitudinal population-based study of approximately 6,600 Danes in a nested case-control design with the primary outcome of 5-year conversion to type 2 diabetes. Nondiabetic subjects, aged >or=39 years, with BMI >or=25 kg/m(2) at baseline were selected. Baseline fasting serum samples from 160 individuals who developed type 2 diabetes and from 472 who did not were tested. An ultrasensitive immunoassay was used to measure of 58 candidate biomarkers in multiple diabetes-associated pathways, along with six routine clinical variables. Statistical learning methods and permutation testing were used to select the most informative biomarkers. Risk model performance was estimated using a validated bootstrap bias-correction procedure. RESULTS: A model using six biomarkers (adiponectin, C-reactive protein, ferritin, interleukin-2 receptor A, glucose, and insulin) was developed for assessing an individual's 5-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This model has a bootstrap-estimated area under the curve of 0.76, which is greater than that for A1C, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, BMI, sex-adjusted waist circumference, a model using fasting glucose and insulin, and a noninvasive clinical model. CONCLUSIONS: A model incorporating six circulating biomarkers provides an objective and quantitative estimate of the 5-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes, performs better than single risk indicators and a noninvasive clinical model, and provides better stratification than fasting plasma glucose alone.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume32
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)1207-12
Number of pages5
ISSN0149-5992
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

ID: 13206303