Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria: impact on number of donors and organ transplants

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria : impact on number of donors and organ transplants. / Hansen, Karen Irgens Tanderup; Kelsen, Jesper; Othman, Marwan H.; Stavngaard, Trine; Kondziella, Daniel.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 11, e15759, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, KIT, Kelsen, J, Othman, MH, Stavngaard, T & Kondziella, D 2023, 'Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria: impact on number of donors and organ transplants', PeerJ, vol. 11, e15759. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15759

APA

Hansen, K. I. T., Kelsen, J., Othman, M. H., Stavngaard, T., & Kondziella, D. (2023). Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria: impact on number of donors and organ transplants. PeerJ, 11, [e15759]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15759

Vancouver

Hansen KIT, Kelsen J, Othman MH, Stavngaard T, Kondziella D. Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria: impact on number of donors and organ transplants. PeerJ. 2023;11. e15759. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15759

Author

Hansen, Karen Irgens Tanderup ; Kelsen, Jesper ; Othman, Marwan H. ; Stavngaard, Trine ; Kondziella, Daniel. / Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria : impact on number of donors and organ transplants. In: PeerJ. 2023 ; Vol. 11.

Bibtex

@article{72911e818eff4c2781f9a2e0c79e2ebb,
title = "Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria: impact on number of donors and organ transplants",
abstract = "Background: Demand for organs exceeds the number of transplants available, underscoring the need to optimize organ donation procedures. However, protocols for determining brain death (BD)/death by neurological criteria (DNC) vary considerably worldwide. In Denmark, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the only legally approved confirmatory test for diagnosing BD/DNC. We investigated the effect of the time delay caused by (repeat) confirmatory DSA on the number of organs donated by patients meeting clinical criteria for BD/DNC. We hypothesized that, first, patients investigated with ≥2 DSAs donate fewer organs than those investigated with a single DSA; second, radiological interpretation of DSA is subject to interrater variability; and third, residual intracranial circulation is inversely correlated with inotropic blood pressure support. Methods: All DSAs performed over a 7-year period as part of BD/DNC protocols at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, were included. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. DSAs were reinterpreted by an independent neurinterventionist blinded to the original radiological reports. Results: We identified 130 DSAs in 100 eligible patients. Patients with ≥2 DSAs (n = 20) donated fewer organs (1.7 +/− 1.6 SD) than patients undergoing a single DSA (n = 80, 2.6 +/− 1.7 organs, p = 0.03), and they became less often donors (n = 12, 60%) than patients with just 1 DSA (n = 65, 81.3%; p = 0.04). Interrater agreement of radiological DSA interpretation was 88.5% (Cohen{\textquoteright}s kappa = 0.76). Patients with self-maintained blood pressure had more often residual intracranial circulation (n = 13/26, 50%) than patients requiring inotropic support (n = 14/74, 18.9%; OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.09–0.61]; p = 0.002). Discussion: In potential donors who fulfill clinical BD/DNC criteria, delays caused by repetition of confirmatory DSA result in lost donors and organ transplants. Self-maintained blood pressure at the time of clinical BD/DNC increases the odds for residual intracranial circulation, creating diagnostic uncertainty because radiological DSA interpretation is not uniform. We suggest that avoiding unnecessary repetition of confirmatory investigations like DSA may result in more organs donated.",
keywords = "Blood pressure, Brain death, Cerebral blood flow, Death by neurological criteria, Digital subtraction angiography, Interrater variability, Intracranial circulation, Organ donation",
author = "Hansen, {Karen Irgens Tanderup} and Jesper Kelsen and Othman, {Marwan H.} and Trine Stavngaard and Daniel Kondziella",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright 2023 Hansen et al.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.7717/peerj.15759",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confirmatory digital subtraction angiography after clinical brain death / death by neurological criteria

T2 - impact on number of donors and organ transplants

AU - Hansen, Karen Irgens Tanderup

AU - Kelsen, Jesper

AU - Othman, Marwan H.

AU - Stavngaard, Trine

AU - Kondziella, Daniel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright 2023 Hansen et al.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Demand for organs exceeds the number of transplants available, underscoring the need to optimize organ donation procedures. However, protocols for determining brain death (BD)/death by neurological criteria (DNC) vary considerably worldwide. In Denmark, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the only legally approved confirmatory test for diagnosing BD/DNC. We investigated the effect of the time delay caused by (repeat) confirmatory DSA on the number of organs donated by patients meeting clinical criteria for BD/DNC. We hypothesized that, first, patients investigated with ≥2 DSAs donate fewer organs than those investigated with a single DSA; second, radiological interpretation of DSA is subject to interrater variability; and third, residual intracranial circulation is inversely correlated with inotropic blood pressure support. Methods: All DSAs performed over a 7-year period as part of BD/DNC protocols at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, were included. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. DSAs were reinterpreted by an independent neurinterventionist blinded to the original radiological reports. Results: We identified 130 DSAs in 100 eligible patients. Patients with ≥2 DSAs (n = 20) donated fewer organs (1.7 +/− 1.6 SD) than patients undergoing a single DSA (n = 80, 2.6 +/− 1.7 organs, p = 0.03), and they became less often donors (n = 12, 60%) than patients with just 1 DSA (n = 65, 81.3%; p = 0.04). Interrater agreement of radiological DSA interpretation was 88.5% (Cohen’s kappa = 0.76). Patients with self-maintained blood pressure had more often residual intracranial circulation (n = 13/26, 50%) than patients requiring inotropic support (n = 14/74, 18.9%; OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.09–0.61]; p = 0.002). Discussion: In potential donors who fulfill clinical BD/DNC criteria, delays caused by repetition of confirmatory DSA result in lost donors and organ transplants. Self-maintained blood pressure at the time of clinical BD/DNC increases the odds for residual intracranial circulation, creating diagnostic uncertainty because radiological DSA interpretation is not uniform. We suggest that avoiding unnecessary repetition of confirmatory investigations like DSA may result in more organs donated.

AB - Background: Demand for organs exceeds the number of transplants available, underscoring the need to optimize organ donation procedures. However, protocols for determining brain death (BD)/death by neurological criteria (DNC) vary considerably worldwide. In Denmark, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the only legally approved confirmatory test for diagnosing BD/DNC. We investigated the effect of the time delay caused by (repeat) confirmatory DSA on the number of organs donated by patients meeting clinical criteria for BD/DNC. We hypothesized that, first, patients investigated with ≥2 DSAs donate fewer organs than those investigated with a single DSA; second, radiological interpretation of DSA is subject to interrater variability; and third, residual intracranial circulation is inversely correlated with inotropic blood pressure support. Methods: All DSAs performed over a 7-year period as part of BD/DNC protocols at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, were included. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. DSAs were reinterpreted by an independent neurinterventionist blinded to the original radiological reports. Results: We identified 130 DSAs in 100 eligible patients. Patients with ≥2 DSAs (n = 20) donated fewer organs (1.7 +/− 1.6 SD) than patients undergoing a single DSA (n = 80, 2.6 +/− 1.7 organs, p = 0.03), and they became less often donors (n = 12, 60%) than patients with just 1 DSA (n = 65, 81.3%; p = 0.04). Interrater agreement of radiological DSA interpretation was 88.5% (Cohen’s kappa = 0.76). Patients with self-maintained blood pressure had more often residual intracranial circulation (n = 13/26, 50%) than patients requiring inotropic support (n = 14/74, 18.9%; OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.09–0.61]; p = 0.002). Discussion: In potential donors who fulfill clinical BD/DNC criteria, delays caused by repetition of confirmatory DSA result in lost donors and organ transplants. Self-maintained blood pressure at the time of clinical BD/DNC increases the odds for residual intracranial circulation, creating diagnostic uncertainty because radiological DSA interpretation is not uniform. We suggest that avoiding unnecessary repetition of confirmatory investigations like DSA may result in more organs donated.

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Brain death

KW - Cerebral blood flow

KW - Death by neurological criteria

KW - Digital subtraction angiography

KW - Interrater variability

KW - Intracranial circulation

KW - Organ donation

U2 - 10.7717/peerj.15759

DO - 10.7717/peerj.15759

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37492400

AN - SCOPUS:85170086120

VL - 11

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

M1 - e15759

ER -

ID: 387835287