Collectivity and Feminist History: Situating Luce Irigaray
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Collectivity and Feminist History: Situating Luce Irigaray. / Roswall, Amanda Grimsbo.
In: Signs, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2024, p. 887-911.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Collectivity and Feminist History: Situating Luce Irigaray
AU - Roswall, Amanda Grimsbo
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Luce Irigaray’s essay “When Our Lips Speak Together” has had a major influence on feminist and queer theorists in Europe and the United States since it was first published, in French, in the Belgian feminist journal Les Cahiers du GRIF in 1976. Yet the reception of the essay in English has developed largely without taking this first place of publication into account. This has led to a dominant understanding of the essay as representing an intellectualist and essentialist feminism. By unfolding the story of the essay’s compositional history and resituating it in the environment of activist and editing groups in Brussels in the 1970s, this article argues that the essay’s representation of collectivity, enacted with different variations of a recurring “we,” should be reread. The article then turns to the example of Judith Butler’s reading of Irigaray to suggest what the stakes of revisiting the essay in its original context might be. As a whole, the article points to a continuity from the early Irigaray to Butler’s later work, suggesting that texts central to second-wave feminism can allow us to draw knowledge and experience of collective work and organization.
AB - Luce Irigaray’s essay “When Our Lips Speak Together” has had a major influence on feminist and queer theorists in Europe and the United States since it was first published, in French, in the Belgian feminist journal Les Cahiers du GRIF in 1976. Yet the reception of the essay in English has developed largely without taking this first place of publication into account. This has led to a dominant understanding of the essay as representing an intellectualist and essentialist feminism. By unfolding the story of the essay’s compositional history and resituating it in the environment of activist and editing groups in Brussels in the 1970s, this article argues that the essay’s representation of collectivity, enacted with different variations of a recurring “we,” should be reread. The article then turns to the example of Judith Butler’s reading of Irigaray to suggest what the stakes of revisiting the essay in its original context might be. As a whole, the article points to a continuity from the early Irigaray to Butler’s later work, suggesting that texts central to second-wave feminism can allow us to draw knowledge and experience of collective work and organization.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 49
SP - 887
EP - 911
JO - Signs
JF - Signs
SN - 0097-9740
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 374658866