Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world : Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study. / Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS).

In: BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, Vol. 3, No. 1, e000081, 10.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) 2015, 'Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study', BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, vol. 3, no. 1, e000081. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

APA

Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) (2015). Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, 3(1), [e000081]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

Vancouver

Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS). Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2015 Mar 10;3(1). e000081. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

Author

Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS). / Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world : Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study. In: BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{29b31178fc034233b4da009cb36a68e0,
title = "Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study",
abstract = "Objective: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Research design and methods: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. Results: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk ( p=0.013). Conclusions: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.",
author = "Dunbar, {James A.} and Hernan, {Andrea L.} and Janus, {Edward D.} and Erkki Vartiainen and Tiina Laatikainen and Versace, {Vincent L.} and John Reynolds and Best, {James D.} and Skinner, {Timothy C.} and O{\textquoteright}Reilly, {Sharleen L.} and Namara, {Kevin P.Mc} and Elizabeth Stewart and Michael Coates and Bennett, {Catherine M.} and Rob Carter and {Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS)}",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "B M J Open Diabetes Research & Care",
issn = "2052-4897",
publisher = "B M J Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world

T2 - Results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study

AU - Dunbar, James A.

AU - Hernan, Andrea L.

AU - Janus, Edward D.

AU - Vartiainen, Erkki

AU - Laatikainen, Tiina

AU - Versace, Vincent L.

AU - Reynolds, John

AU - Best, James D.

AU - Skinner, Timothy C.

AU - O’Reilly, Sharleen L.

AU - Namara, Kevin P.Mc

AU - Stewart, Elizabeth

AU - Coates, Michael

AU - Bennett, Catherine M.

AU - Carter, Rob

AU - Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS)

PY - 2015/3/10

Y1 - 2015/3/10

N2 - Objective: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Research design and methods: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. Results: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk ( p=0.013). Conclusions: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.

AB - Objective: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Research design and methods: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. Results: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk ( p=0.013). Conclusions: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991265859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

DO - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84991265859

VL - 3

JO - B M J Open Diabetes Research & Care

JF - B M J Open Diabetes Research & Care

SN - 2052-4897

IS - 1

M1 - e000081

ER -

ID: 198719969