A randomised evaluation of low-dose cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) plus tosedostat versus low-dose ara-C in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the LI-1 trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Submitted manuscript, 392 KB, PDF document

  • Mike Dennis
  • Alan Burnett
  • Robert Hills
  • Ian Thomas
  • Cono Ariti
  • Marianne T. Severinsen
  • Claire Hemmaway
  • Paul Greaves
  • Richard E. Clark
  • Mhairi Copland
  • Nigel Russell
  • Maria Kallenbach
  • Dominic Culligan
  • Caroline Duncan
  • Pramila Krishnamurthy
  • Ann Cuthbert
  • Chetan Patalappa
  • Michail Spanoudakis
  • David Galvani
  • I. Berkahn
  • N. Patton
  • Lucy Pemberton
  • Andres Virchis
  • Parag Jasani
  • Anne Parker
  • Claire Arnold
  • Robert Cuthbert
  • Damien Finnega
  • Manos Nikolousis
  • Guy Pratt
  • Paul Cahalin
  • Sam Ackroyd
  • Priyanka Mehta
  • Rachel Protheroe
  • Robert Weinkove
  • Sara Ali
  • Emma Welch
  • Mark Smith
  • Ruth Spearing
  • Paresh Vyas
  • Gavin Campbell
  • Mike Hamblin
  • Marion Wood
  • Sunil Gupta
  • Simon Westonsmith
  • Arvind Pillai
  • Hannah Hunter
  • Lars Kjeldsen
  • Niemann, Carsten
  • Asif Khan
  • on behalf of the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) Working Group

Older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) account for nearly half of those with the disease. Because they are perceived to be unfit for, unwilling to receive, or unlikely to benefit from conventional chemotherapy they represent an important unmet need. Tosedostat is a selective oral aminopeptidase inhibitor, which in phase I/II trials showed acceptable toxicity and encouraging efficacy. We report the only randomised study of low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) combined with tosedostat (LDAC-T) versus LDAC in untreated older patients not suitable for intensive treatment. A total of 243 patients were randomised 1:1 as part of the ‘Pick-a-Winner’ LI-1 trial. There was a statistically non-significant increase in the complete remission (CR) rate with the addition of tosedostat, LDAC-T 19% versus LDAC 12% [odds ratio (OR) 0·61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·30–1·23; P = 0·17]. For overall response (CR+CR with incomplete recovery of counts), there was little evidence of a benefit to the addition of tosedostat (25% vs. 18%; OR 0·68, 95% CI 0·37–1·27; P = 0·22). However, overall survival (OS) showed no difference (2-year OS 16% vs. 12%, hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·73–1·28; P = 0·8). Exploratory analyses failed to identify any subgroup benefitting from tosedostat. Despite promising pre-clinical, early non-randomised clinical data with acceptable toxicity and an improvement in response, we did not find evidence that the addition of tosedostat to LDAC produced a survival benefit in this group of patients with AML. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN40571019.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Volume194
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)298-308
Number of pages11
ISSN0007-1048
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Research areas

  • acute leukaemia, AML, chemotherapy, elderly

ID: 302166492