A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy. / Hellsmark, Hans; Hansen, Teis.
In: Energy Policy, Vol. 145, 111763, 10.2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy
AU - Hellsmark, Hans
AU - Hansen, Teis
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - This paper develops a more detailed understanding of when incumbent actors may become the main locomotive driving energy transitions. It also illustrates the trade-offs between policy approaches that actively seek to involve the incumbents in transitions, and policy approaches that pursue transitions without their active involvement. The paper examines state support for the bioeconomy in Sweden and concludes that public investments have been geared towards large-scale, complex and integrated biorefineries that are dependent on the active participation of the forest industry. Incumbents in the forest industry have, however, both lacked motivation and the abilities required to take the necessary steps for commercialisation of the demonstrated concepts. Instead, a rather small investment in a joint venture between actors from the forestry and oil refinery industry in Sweden has spurred learning and revenues; and it has placed an oil refinery at the centre of the future development of what we here term distributed biorefining. The main trade-off is that while this shift has opened up for cross-industrial collaborations and the production of advanced biofuels and materials, it has also paved the way for further investments in existing fossil-fuel infrastructure.
AB - This paper develops a more detailed understanding of when incumbent actors may become the main locomotive driving energy transitions. It also illustrates the trade-offs between policy approaches that actively seek to involve the incumbents in transitions, and policy approaches that pursue transitions without their active involvement. The paper examines state support for the bioeconomy in Sweden and concludes that public investments have been geared towards large-scale, complex and integrated biorefineries that are dependent on the active participation of the forest industry. Incumbents in the forest industry have, however, both lacked motivation and the abilities required to take the necessary steps for commercialisation of the demonstrated concepts. Instead, a rather small investment in a joint venture between actors from the forestry and oil refinery industry in Sweden has spurred learning and revenues; and it has placed an oil refinery at the centre of the future development of what we here term distributed biorefining. The main trade-off is that while this shift has opened up for cross-industrial collaborations and the production of advanced biofuels and materials, it has also paved the way for further investments in existing fossil-fuel infrastructure.
KW - Bioeconomy
KW - Distributed biorefinery
KW - Energy transition
KW - Incumbents
KW - Infrastructure
KW - Oil industry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088947862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111763
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111763
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85088947862
VL - 145
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
SN - 0301-4215
M1 - 111763
ER -
ID: 255102715