Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others,

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others, / Ketscher, Kirsten; Semanda, Freya; Carneiro, Marta Maria Amaro da C L.

Feminist Judgments in International Law. ed. / Troy Lavers ; Loveday Hodson. 1. ed. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2019. p. 149-169.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ketscher, K, Semanda, F & Carneiro, MMADCL 2019, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others, in T Lavers & L Hodson (eds), Feminist Judgments in International Law. 1 edn, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 149-169.

APA

Ketscher, K., Semanda, F., & Carneiro, M. M. A. D. C. L. (2019). Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others, In T. Lavers , & L. Hodson (Eds.), Feminist Judgments in International Law (1 ed., pp. 149-169). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Vancouver

Ketscher K, Semanda F, Carneiro MMADCL. Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others, In Lavers T, Hodson L, editors, Feminist Judgments in International Law. 1 ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 2019. p. 149-169

Author

Ketscher, Kirsten ; Semanda, Freya ; Carneiro, Marta Maria Amaro da C L. / Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others,. Feminist Judgments in International Law. editor / Troy Lavers ; Loveday Hodson. 1. ed. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2019. pp. 149-169

Bibtex

@inbook{1acdff193ecf44e596173b0f43d4e0d9,
title = "G{\'o}mez-Lim{\'o}n S{\'a}nchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others,",
abstract = "The emergence of feminist rewriting of key judgments has been one of the most interesting recent developments in legal methodology. This unique enterprise has seen scholars collaborate in the 'real world' task of reassessing jurisprudence in light of feminist perspectives.This important new volume makes a significant contribution to the endeavour, exploring how key judgments in international law might have differed if feminist judges had sat on the bench.This collection asks whether feminist perspectives can offer meaningful and viable alternatives to international law norms; and if so, whether that application results in distinguishable differences in outcomes. It answers these questions with particular reference to sources of international law, the public and private divide, State responsibility, State immunities, treaty law, State sovereignty, human rights protection, global governance, and the concept of violence in international law. This landmark publication offers a truly innovative reassessment of international law.",
author = "Kirsten Ketscher and Freya Semanda and Carneiro, {Marta Maria Amaro da C L}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781509914456",
pages = "149--169",
editor = "{Lavers }, {Troy } and Hodson, {Loveday }",
booktitle = "Feminist Judgments in International Law",
publisher = "Hart Publishing",
edition = "1",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others,

AU - Ketscher, Kirsten

AU - Semanda, Freya

AU - Carneiro, Marta Maria Amaro da C L

PY - 2019/8/6

Y1 - 2019/8/6

N2 - The emergence of feminist rewriting of key judgments has been one of the most interesting recent developments in legal methodology. This unique enterprise has seen scholars collaborate in the 'real world' task of reassessing jurisprudence in light of feminist perspectives.This important new volume makes a significant contribution to the endeavour, exploring how key judgments in international law might have differed if feminist judges had sat on the bench.This collection asks whether feminist perspectives can offer meaningful and viable alternatives to international law norms; and if so, whether that application results in distinguishable differences in outcomes. It answers these questions with particular reference to sources of international law, the public and private divide, State responsibility, State immunities, treaty law, State sovereignty, human rights protection, global governance, and the concept of violence in international law. This landmark publication offers a truly innovative reassessment of international law.

AB - The emergence of feminist rewriting of key judgments has been one of the most interesting recent developments in legal methodology. This unique enterprise has seen scholars collaborate in the 'real world' task of reassessing jurisprudence in light of feminist perspectives.This important new volume makes a significant contribution to the endeavour, exploring how key judgments in international law might have differed if feminist judges had sat on the bench.This collection asks whether feminist perspectives can offer meaningful and viable alternatives to international law norms; and if so, whether that application results in distinguishable differences in outcomes. It answers these questions with particular reference to sources of international law, the public and private divide, State responsibility, State immunities, treaty law, State sovereignty, human rights protection, global governance, and the concept of violence in international law. This landmark publication offers a truly innovative reassessment of international law.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781509914456

SP - 149

EP - 169

BT - Feminist Judgments in International Law

A2 - Lavers , Troy

A2 - Hodson, Loveday

PB - Hart Publishing

CY - Oxford

ER -

ID: 182426353