Creating EU law judges: the role of generational differences, legal education and judicial career paths in national judges' assessment regarding EU law knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Juan Antonio Mayoral Diaz-Asensio, Urszula Jaremba, Tobias Nowak

The judicial protection system in the European Union (EU) is premised on the fact that national judges are supposed to act as decentralized EU judges. This role is exercised through tools enshrined in, inter alia, primacy, direct and indirect effect of EU law, and the preliminary ruling procedure. However, a number of studies show that national judges experience difficulties in exercising EU competences due to their lack of knowledge in the field of EU law. In this contribution we study the differences in the level of self-evaluation of EU law knowledge among judges, which consequently influence the way judges approach EU law. For that purpose we question the relevance of several institutional and socio-legal factors, such as organization of the judiciary, generation, the system of legal education and judicial training and practical experience with EU law. Our analysis is based on data collected from German, Dutch, Polish and Spanish judges.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume21
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1120-1141
Number of pages21
ISSN1350-1763
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2014

    Research areas

  • The Faculty of Law - EU law knowledge, Europeanization of the judiciary, Judicial training and networks, National judges, Legal generations and education

ID: 132377640