Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. / Rytter, Jens Elo.

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. ed. / Fiona de Londras; Fergal F. Davis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 56-74.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rytter, JE 2014, Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. in F de Londras & FF Davis (eds), Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004

APA

Rytter, J. E. (2014). Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. In F. de Londras, & F. F. Davis (Eds.), Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (pp. 56-74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004

Vancouver

Rytter JE. Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. In de Londras F, Davis FF, editors, Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 56-74 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004

Author

Rytter, Jens Elo. / Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. editor / Fiona de Londras ; Fergal F. Davis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 56-74

Bibtex

@inbook{17c9014171f848a497860331a7579346,
title = "Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary",
abstract = "The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.",
keywords = "The Faculty of Law, domstolskontrol, terrorisme , danmark",
author = "Rytter, {Jens Elo}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107053618",
pages = "56--74",
editor = "{de Londras}, Fiona and Davis, {Fergal F. }",
booktitle = "Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary

AU - Rytter, Jens Elo

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.

AB - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.

KW - The Faculty of Law

KW - domstolskontrol

KW - terrorisme

KW - danmark

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781107053618

SN - 9781107662964

SP - 56

EP - 74

BT - Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

A2 - de Londras, Fiona

A2 - Davis, Fergal F.

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -

ID: 130524047