Respiratory influence on left atrial volume calculation with 3D-echocardiography

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) estimation with 3D echocardiography has been shown to be more accurate than 2D volume calculation. However, little is known about the possible effect of respiratory movements on the accuracy of the measurement.

METHODS: 100 consecutive patients admitted with chest pain were examined with 3D echocardiography and LAV was quantified during inspiratory breath hold, expiratory breath hold and during free breathing.

RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, only 65 had an echocardiographic window that allowed for 3D echocardiography in the entire respiratory cycle. Mean atrial end diastolic volume was 45.4 ± 14.5 during inspiratory breath hold, 46.4 ± 14.8 during expiratory breath hold and 45.6 ± 14.3 during free respiration. Mean end systolic volume was 17.6 ± 7.8 during inspiratory breath hold, 18.8 ± 8.0 during expiratory breath hold and 18.3 ± 8.0 during free respiration. No significant differences were seen in any of the measured parameters.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study adds to the feasibility of 3D LAV quantitation. LAV estimation by 3D echocardiography may be performed during either end-expiratory or end-inspiratory breath-hold without any significant difference in the calculated volume. Also, the LAV estimation may be performed during free breathing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
JournalCardiovascular Ultrasound
Volume14
Number of pages6
ISSN1476-7120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2016

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Artifacts, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional, Female, Heart Atria, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Male, Middle Aged, Motion, Organ Size, Reproducibility of Results, Respiratory Mechanics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 176336498