Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. / Olsen, Anne Helene; Agbaje, Olorunsola F; Myles, Jonathan P; Lynge, Elsebeth; Duffy, Stephen W.

In: Breast Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2006, p. 338-42.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Olsen, AH, Agbaje, OF, Myles, JP, Lynge, E & Duffy, SW 2006, 'Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.', Breast Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 338-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x

APA

Olsen, A. H., Agbaje, O. F., Myles, J. P., Lynge, E., & Duffy, S. W. (2006). Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. Breast Journal, 12(4), 338-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x

Vancouver

Olsen AH, Agbaje OF, Myles JP, Lynge E, Duffy SW. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. Breast Journal. 2006;12(4):338-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x

Author

Olsen, Anne Helene ; Agbaje, Olorunsola F ; Myles, Jonathan P ; Lynge, Elsebeth ; Duffy, Stephen W. / Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. In: Breast Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 338-42.

Bibtex

@article{998534e0b24e11ddb04f000ea68e967b,

title = "Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.",

abstract = "The goal of this research was to estimate the overdiagnosis at the first and second screens of the mammography screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark. This study involves a mammography service screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark, with 35,123 women screened at least once. We fit multistate models to the screening data, including preclinical incidence of progressive cancers and nonprogressive (i.e., overdiagnosed) cancers. We estimated mean sojourn time as 2.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.1) and screening test sensitivity as 100% (95% CI 99.8-100). Overdiagnosis was estimated to be 7.8% (95% CI 0.3-26.5) at the first screen and 0.5% (95% CI 0.02-2.1) at the second screen. This corresponds to 4.8% of all cancers diagnosed among participants during the first two invitation rounds and following intervals. A modest overdiagnosis was estimated for the Copenhagen screening program, deriving almost exclusively from the first screen. The CIs were very broad, however, and estimates from larger datasets are warranted.",

author = "Olsen, {Anne Helene} and Agbaje, {Olorunsola F} and Myles, {Jonathan P} and Elsebeth Lynge and Duffy, {Stephen W}",

note = "Keywords: Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Denmark; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Mammography; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Sensitivity and Specificity",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "338--42",

journal = "Breast Journal",

issn = "1075-122X",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.

AU - Olsen, Anne Helene

AU - Agbaje, Olorunsola F

AU - Myles, Jonathan P

AU - Lynge, Elsebeth

AU - Duffy, Stephen W

N1 - Keywords: Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Denmark; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Mammography; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Sensitivity and Specificity

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The goal of this research was to estimate the overdiagnosis at the first and second screens of the mammography screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark. This study involves a mammography service screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark, with 35,123 women screened at least once. We fit multistate models to the screening data, including preclinical incidence of progressive cancers and nonprogressive (i.e., overdiagnosed) cancers. We estimated mean sojourn time as 2.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.1) and screening test sensitivity as 100% (95% CI 99.8-100). Overdiagnosis was estimated to be 7.8% (95% CI 0.3-26.5) at the first screen and 0.5% (95% CI 0.02-2.1) at the second screen. This corresponds to 4.8% of all cancers diagnosed among participants during the first two invitation rounds and following intervals. A modest overdiagnosis was estimated for the Copenhagen screening program, deriving almost exclusively from the first screen. The CIs were very broad, however, and estimates from larger datasets are warranted.

AB - The goal of this research was to estimate the overdiagnosis at the first and second screens of the mammography screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark. This study involves a mammography service screening program in Copenhagen, Denmark, with 35,123 women screened at least once. We fit multistate models to the screening data, including preclinical incidence of progressive cancers and nonprogressive (i.e., overdiagnosed) cancers. We estimated mean sojourn time as 2.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.1) and screening test sensitivity as 100% (95% CI 99.8-100). Overdiagnosis was estimated to be 7.8% (95% CI 0.3-26.5) at the first screen and 0.5% (95% CI 0.02-2.1) at the second screen. This corresponds to 4.8% of all cancers diagnosed among participants during the first two invitation rounds and following intervals. A modest overdiagnosis was estimated for the Copenhagen screening program, deriving almost exclusively from the first screen. The CIs were very broad, however, and estimates from larger datasets are warranted.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00272.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16848843

VL - 12

SP - 338

EP - 342

JO - Breast Journal

JF - Breast Journal

SN - 1075-122X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 8592169