Appraising the causal relevance of DNA methylation for risk of lung cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  • Thomas Battram
  • Rebecca C. Richmond
  • Laura Baglietto
  • Philip C. Haycock
  • Vittorio Perduca
  • Tom R. Gaunt
  • Gibran Hemani
  • Florence Guida
  • Robert Carreras-Torres
  • Rayjean Hung
  • Christopher I. Amos
  • Joshua R. Freeman
  • Torkjel M. Sandanger
  • Therese H. Nøst
  • Andrew E. Teschendorff
  • Silvia Polidoro
  • Paolo Vineis
  • Gianluca Severi
  • Allison M. Hodge
  • Graham G. Giles
  • Kjell Grankvist
  • Mikael B. Johansson
  • Mattias Johansson
  • George Davey Smith
  • Caroline L. Relton

Background: DNA methylation changes in peripheral blood have recently been identified in relation to lung cancer risk. Some of these changes have been suggested to mediate part of the effect of smoking on lung cancer. However, limitations with conventional mediation analyses mean that the causal nature of these methylation changes has yet to be fully elucidated. Methods: We first performed a meta-analysis of four epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of lung cancer (918 cases, 918 controls). Next, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis, using genetic instruments for methylation at CpG sites identified in the EWAS meta-analysis, and 29 863 cases and 55 586 controls from the TRICL-ILCCO lung cancer consortium, to appraise the possible causal role of methylation at these sites on lung cancer. Results: Sixteen CpG sites were identified from the EWAS meta-analysis [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05], for 14 of which we could identify genetic instruments. Mendelian randomization provided little evidence that DNA methylation in peripheral blood at the 14 CpG sites plays a causal role in lung cancer development (FDR > 0.05), including for cg05575921-AHRR where methylation is strongly associated with both smoke exposure and lung cancer risk. Conclusions: The results contrast with previous observational and mediation analysis, which have made strong claims regarding the causal role of DNA methylation. Thus, previous suggestions of a mediating role of methylation at sites identified in peripheral blood, such as cg05575921-AHRR, could be unfounded. However, this study does not preclude the possibility that differential DNA methylation at other sites is causally involved in lung cancer development, especially within lung tissue.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1493-1504
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • ALSPAC, ARIES, DNA methylation, Lung cancer, Mendelian randomization

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and

No data available

ID: 241366552