What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination. / Lynge, Elsebeth; Antilla, Ahti; Arbyn, Marc; Segnan, Nereo; Ronco, Guglielmo.

In: European Journal of Cancer, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lynge, E, Antilla, A, Arbyn, M, Segnan, N & Ronco, G 2009, 'What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination', European Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024

APA

Lynge, E., Antilla, A., Arbyn, M., Segnan, N., & Ronco, G. (2009). What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination. European Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024

Vancouver

Lynge E, Antilla A, Arbyn M, Segnan N, Ronco G. What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination. European Journal of Cancer. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024

Author

Lynge, Elsebeth ; Antilla, Ahti ; Arbyn, Marc ; Segnan, Nereo ; Ronco, Guglielmo. / What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination. In: European Journal of Cancer. 2009.

Bibtex

@article{661e5b009c6c11debc73000ea68e967b,
title = "What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination",
abstract = "AIM: To outline the perspectives for future control of cervical cancer in Europe. METHODS: Review of current status for major cervical cancer control tools. The review was based on PubMed searches for cervical cancer prevention, Human Papillomavirus, HPV-test, HPV-vaccination, and treatment with large loop excision of the transformation zone, LLETZ. RESULTS: Recent studies suggest that condom use offers some but not complete protection against HPV-infection. High quality cytology screening with good population coverage reduces the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. Randomised controlled trials have found HPV-testing to increase the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, CIN2+, compared with cytology. Two studies found a decreased detection rate of CIN3+ in the HPV-testing arm at the subsequent screening. Randomised controlled trials found that women not infected with vaccine HPV-types at vaccination are well protected against CIN2+ from these HPV-types, but the vaccine does not protect against CIN2+ from other HPV-types and neither does it protect already HPV infected women. There is an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes following excisional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The future of cervical cancer control may become a diversified strategy, one for non-vaccinated birth cohorts and another for vaccinated cohorts. It will take another 50 years before the non-vaccinated cohorts have passed the screening age. With the current uncertainty concerning the long term protection from HPV-vaccination it will furthermore be precautionary to continue screening practice for the first cohorts of HPV-vaccinated women. Organised vaccination and screening programmes with good record keeping are necessary to optimise the future control of cervical cancer.",
author = "Elsebeth Lynge and Ahti Antilla and Marc Arbyn and Nereo Segnan and Guglielmo Ronco",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer, Supplement",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination

AU - Lynge, Elsebeth

AU - Antilla, Ahti

AU - Arbyn, Marc

AU - Segnan, Nereo

AU - Ronco, Guglielmo

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - AIM: To outline the perspectives for future control of cervical cancer in Europe. METHODS: Review of current status for major cervical cancer control tools. The review was based on PubMed searches for cervical cancer prevention, Human Papillomavirus, HPV-test, HPV-vaccination, and treatment with large loop excision of the transformation zone, LLETZ. RESULTS: Recent studies suggest that condom use offers some but not complete protection against HPV-infection. High quality cytology screening with good population coverage reduces the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. Randomised controlled trials have found HPV-testing to increase the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, CIN2+, compared with cytology. Two studies found a decreased detection rate of CIN3+ in the HPV-testing arm at the subsequent screening. Randomised controlled trials found that women not infected with vaccine HPV-types at vaccination are well protected against CIN2+ from these HPV-types, but the vaccine does not protect against CIN2+ from other HPV-types and neither does it protect already HPV infected women. There is an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes following excisional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The future of cervical cancer control may become a diversified strategy, one for non-vaccinated birth cohorts and another for vaccinated cohorts. It will take another 50 years before the non-vaccinated cohorts have passed the screening age. With the current uncertainty concerning the long term protection from HPV-vaccination it will furthermore be precautionary to continue screening practice for the first cohorts of HPV-vaccinated women. Organised vaccination and screening programmes with good record keeping are necessary to optimise the future control of cervical cancer.

AB - AIM: To outline the perspectives for future control of cervical cancer in Europe. METHODS: Review of current status for major cervical cancer control tools. The review was based on PubMed searches for cervical cancer prevention, Human Papillomavirus, HPV-test, HPV-vaccination, and treatment with large loop excision of the transformation zone, LLETZ. RESULTS: Recent studies suggest that condom use offers some but not complete protection against HPV-infection. High quality cytology screening with good population coverage reduces the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. Randomised controlled trials have found HPV-testing to increase the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, CIN2+, compared with cytology. Two studies found a decreased detection rate of CIN3+ in the HPV-testing arm at the subsequent screening. Randomised controlled trials found that women not infected with vaccine HPV-types at vaccination are well protected against CIN2+ from these HPV-types, but the vaccine does not protect against CIN2+ from other HPV-types and neither does it protect already HPV infected women. There is an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes following excisional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The future of cervical cancer control may become a diversified strategy, one for non-vaccinated birth cohorts and another for vaccinated cohorts. It will take another 50 years before the non-vaccinated cohorts have passed the screening age. With the current uncertainty concerning the long term protection from HPV-vaccination it will furthermore be precautionary to continue screening practice for the first cohorts of HPV-vaccinated women. Organised vaccination and screening programmes with good record keeping are necessary to optimise the future control of cervical cancer.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.024

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19695870

JO - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

JF - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

SN - 0959-8049

ER -

ID: 14277770