Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark. / Olsen, Niklas.

Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia : Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations. ed. / Niklas Olsen; Johan Östling; David Larsson Heidenblad. Routledge, 2020. p. 111-126 (Knowledge Societies in History).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Olsen, N 2020, Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark. in N Olsen, J Östling & DL Heidenblad (eds), Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia : Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations. Routledge, Knowledge Societies in History, pp. 111-126. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019275-9

APA

Olsen, N. (2020). Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark. In N. Olsen, J. Östling, & D. L. Heidenblad (Eds.), Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia : Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations (pp. 111-126). Routledge. Knowledge Societies in History https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019275-9

Vancouver

Olsen N. Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark. In Olsen N, Östling J, Heidenblad DL, editors, Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia : Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations. Routledge. 2020. p. 111-126. (Knowledge Societies in History). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019275-9

Author

Olsen, Niklas. / Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark. Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia : Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations. editor / Niklas Olsen ; Johan Östling ; David Larsson Heidenblad. Routledge, 2020. pp. 111-126 (Knowledge Societies in History).

Bibtex

@inbook{6344505b878a402193558744e4c8cdf5,
title = "Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark",
abstract = "This chapter describes the advent of welfare state criticism as elite criticism in the Danish political debate. It focuses on three of the most prolific contemporary critics of the welfare state: founder of the libertarian populist party Fremskridtspartiet, Mogens Glistrup; Marxist and economist J{\o}rgen Dich; and Bertel Haarder, member of the Danish Liberal Party. The chapter highlights how welfare state criticism as elite criticism came about in processes of conceptual circulation and transformation, which, at times, eluded individual intentions and control but nonetheless signified an ideational convergence. While many politicians, scholars, and intellectuals from different ideological camps voiced welfare state criticism as elite criticism, some played more crucial role than others in framing debate on crisis of the welfare state. Welfare state criticism as elite criticism was constructed in processes of circulation through which social commentators picked up, appropriated, and transformed rhetorical styles and political concepts to fit several highly diverse political agendas.",
author = "Niklas Olsen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.4324/9781003019275-9",
language = "English",
series = "Knowledge Societies in History",
pages = "111--126",
editor = "Olsen, {Niklas } and {\"O}stling, {Johan } and Heidenblad, {David Larsson}",
booktitle = "Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Welfare State Criticism as Elite Criticism in 1970s Denmark

AU - Olsen, Niklas

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This chapter describes the advent of welfare state criticism as elite criticism in the Danish political debate. It focuses on three of the most prolific contemporary critics of the welfare state: founder of the libertarian populist party Fremskridtspartiet, Mogens Glistrup; Marxist and economist Jørgen Dich; and Bertel Haarder, member of the Danish Liberal Party. The chapter highlights how welfare state criticism as elite criticism came about in processes of conceptual circulation and transformation, which, at times, eluded individual intentions and control but nonetheless signified an ideational convergence. While many politicians, scholars, and intellectuals from different ideological camps voiced welfare state criticism as elite criticism, some played more crucial role than others in framing debate on crisis of the welfare state. Welfare state criticism as elite criticism was constructed in processes of circulation through which social commentators picked up, appropriated, and transformed rhetorical styles and political concepts to fit several highly diverse political agendas.

AB - This chapter describes the advent of welfare state criticism as elite criticism in the Danish political debate. It focuses on three of the most prolific contemporary critics of the welfare state: founder of the libertarian populist party Fremskridtspartiet, Mogens Glistrup; Marxist and economist Jørgen Dich; and Bertel Haarder, member of the Danish Liberal Party. The chapter highlights how welfare state criticism as elite criticism came about in processes of conceptual circulation and transformation, which, at times, eluded individual intentions and control but nonetheless signified an ideational convergence. While many politicians, scholars, and intellectuals from different ideological camps voiced welfare state criticism as elite criticism, some played more crucial role than others in framing debate on crisis of the welfare state. Welfare state criticism as elite criticism was constructed in processes of circulation through which social commentators picked up, appropriated, and transformed rhetorical styles and political concepts to fit several highly diverse political agendas.

U2 - 10.4324/9781003019275-9

DO - 10.4324/9781003019275-9

M3 - Book chapter

T3 - Knowledge Societies in History

SP - 111

EP - 126

BT - Histories of Knowledge in Postwar Scandinavia

A2 - Olsen, Niklas

A2 - Östling, Johan

A2 - Heidenblad, David Larsson

PB - Routledge

ER -

ID: 242609017