Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta. / Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov; Møller-Sørensen, Hasse; Kjaergaard, Jesper; Jensen, Maiken Brit; Lund, Jens Teglgaard; Pedersen, Mads Møller; Olesen, Jacob Bjerring; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann.

In: Ultrasonic Imaging, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, KL, Møller-Sørensen, H, Kjaergaard, J, Jensen, MB, Lund, JT, Pedersen, MM, Olesen, JB, Jensen, JA & Nielsen, MB 2017, 'Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta', Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0161734615620137

APA

Hansen, K. L., Møller-Sørensen, H., Kjaergaard, J., Jensen, M. B., Lund, J. T., Pedersen, M. M., Olesen, J. B., Jensen, J. A., & Nielsen, M. B. (2017). Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta. Ultrasonic Imaging, 39(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0161734615620137

Vancouver

Hansen KL, Møller-Sørensen H, Kjaergaard J, Jensen MB, Lund JT, Pedersen MM et al. Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta. Ultrasonic Imaging. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0161734615620137

Author

Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov ; Møller-Sørensen, Hasse ; Kjaergaard, Jesper ; Jensen, Maiken Brit ; Lund, Jens Teglgaard ; Pedersen, Mads Møller ; Olesen, Jacob Bjerring ; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann. / Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta. In: Ultrasonic Imaging. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 3-18.

Bibtex

@article{06ec04f6248b4580bf66e778d5581246,
title = "Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta",
abstract = "Transverse oscillation (TO) is a real-time ultrasound vector flow method implemented on a commercial scanner. The TO setup was examined on a flowrig with constant and pulsatile flow. Subsequently, 25 patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery were scanned intraoperatively with TO on the ascending aorta and compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PACTD). On the flowrig, TO had a precision of 5.5%, 9.4% and 14.7%, a percentage error of 18.2%, 14.6% and 40.7%, and a mean bias of 0.4 cm/s, 36.8 ml/min and 32.4 ml/min for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. The correlation coefficients for all flowrig evaluations were 0.99 indicating systematic bias. After bias correction, the percentage error was reduced to 11.5%, 12.6% and 15.9% for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. In the in vivo setup, TO, TEE, and PACTD had a precision of 21.9%, 13.7%, and 12.0%. TO compared with TEE and PACTD had a mean bias of 12.6 cm/s and 0.08 l/min, and a percentage error of 23.4%, and 36.7%, respectively. The percentage error was reduced to 22.9% for the TEE comparison, but increased to 43.8% for the PACTD comparison, after correction for the systematic bias found in the flowrig. TO is a reliable and precise method for velocity and flow rate estimation on a flowrig. However, TO with the present setup, is not interchangeable with PACTD for cardiac volume flow estimation, but is a reliable and precise angle-independent ultrasound alternative for velocity estimation of cardiac flow.",
keywords = "ascending aorta, flowrig, intraoperative cardiac ultrasound, transverse oscillation, vector flow imaging",
author = "Hansen, {Kristoffer Lindskov} and Hasse M{\o}ller-S{\o}rensen and Jesper Kjaergaard and Jensen, {Maiken Brit} and Lund, {Jens Teglgaard} and Pedersen, {Mads M{\o}ller} and Olesen, {Jacob Bjerring} and Jensen, {J{\o}rgen Arendt} and Nielsen, {Michael Bachmann}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0161734615620137",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Ultrasonic Imaging",
issn = "0161-7346",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Conventional Doppler Ultrasound and Thermodilution for Estimation of Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta

AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov

AU - Møller-Sørensen, Hasse

AU - Kjaergaard, Jesper

AU - Jensen, Maiken Brit

AU - Lund, Jens Teglgaard

AU - Pedersen, Mads Møller

AU - Olesen, Jacob Bjerring

AU - Jensen, Jørgen Arendt

AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Transverse oscillation (TO) is a real-time ultrasound vector flow method implemented on a commercial scanner. The TO setup was examined on a flowrig with constant and pulsatile flow. Subsequently, 25 patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery were scanned intraoperatively with TO on the ascending aorta and compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PACTD). On the flowrig, TO had a precision of 5.5%, 9.4% and 14.7%, a percentage error of 18.2%, 14.6% and 40.7%, and a mean bias of 0.4 cm/s, 36.8 ml/min and 32.4 ml/min for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. The correlation coefficients for all flowrig evaluations were 0.99 indicating systematic bias. After bias correction, the percentage error was reduced to 11.5%, 12.6% and 15.9% for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. In the in vivo setup, TO, TEE, and PACTD had a precision of 21.9%, 13.7%, and 12.0%. TO compared with TEE and PACTD had a mean bias of 12.6 cm/s and 0.08 l/min, and a percentage error of 23.4%, and 36.7%, respectively. The percentage error was reduced to 22.9% for the TEE comparison, but increased to 43.8% for the PACTD comparison, after correction for the systematic bias found in the flowrig. TO is a reliable and precise method for velocity and flow rate estimation on a flowrig. However, TO with the present setup, is not interchangeable with PACTD for cardiac volume flow estimation, but is a reliable and precise angle-independent ultrasound alternative for velocity estimation of cardiac flow.

AB - Transverse oscillation (TO) is a real-time ultrasound vector flow method implemented on a commercial scanner. The TO setup was examined on a flowrig with constant and pulsatile flow. Subsequently, 25 patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery were scanned intraoperatively with TO on the ascending aorta and compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PACTD). On the flowrig, TO had a precision of 5.5%, 9.4% and 14.7%, a percentage error of 18.2%, 14.6% and 40.7%, and a mean bias of 0.4 cm/s, 36.8 ml/min and 32.4 ml/min for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. The correlation coefficients for all flowrig evaluations were 0.99 indicating systematic bias. After bias correction, the percentage error was reduced to 11.5%, 12.6% and 15.9% for velocity and flow rate (constant and pulsatile) estimation. In the in vivo setup, TO, TEE, and PACTD had a precision of 21.9%, 13.7%, and 12.0%. TO compared with TEE and PACTD had a mean bias of 12.6 cm/s and 0.08 l/min, and a percentage error of 23.4%, and 36.7%, respectively. The percentage error was reduced to 22.9% for the TEE comparison, but increased to 43.8% for the PACTD comparison, after correction for the systematic bias found in the flowrig. TO is a reliable and precise method for velocity and flow rate estimation on a flowrig. However, TO with the present setup, is not interchangeable with PACTD for cardiac volume flow estimation, but is a reliable and precise angle-independent ultrasound alternative for velocity estimation of cardiac flow.

KW - ascending aorta

KW - flowrig

KW - intraoperative cardiac ultrasound

KW - transverse oscillation

KW - vector flow imaging

U2 - 10.1177/0161734615620137

DO - 10.1177/0161734615620137

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26705136

AN - SCOPUS:85006998742

VL - 39

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Ultrasonic Imaging

JF - Ultrasonic Imaging

SN - 0161-7346

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 176610971