TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning for determination of body composition in IDDM patients

AU - Rosenfalck, A M

AU - Almdal, T

AU - Gotfredsen, A

AU - Hojgaard, L L

AU - Hilsted, J

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - Data on body composition in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) are scarce. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning has proved useful for this purpose in other groups of patients. We tested the validity of the DXA scanner for the determination of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass in IDDM patients and control subjects, as compared to other reference methods, i.e. total body potassium by 40K whole body counting (TBK), total body water by tritiated water (TBW), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and 24-h urinary creatinine excretion (Ucrea). A total of 13 healthy controls, 5 males and 8 females, aged 34.2 years +/- SD 10.4, and 11 IDDM patients, 5 males, 6 females, aged 28.1 years +/- 7.3, diabetes duration 4.2 +/- 2.9 (1.0-9.9), were examined. The patients had no long-term diabetic complications and they had normal ophthalmoscopy and urine albumin excretion. The agreement between FFM estimated by DXA and the other methods, expressed as mean difference +/- 2 SD was; for DXA vs. TBK, 0.09 +/- 6.26 and 0.50 +/- 5.26 kg for controls and IDDM patients respectively; DXA vs. TBW, -2.07 +/- 2.56 and -1.07 +/- 4.58 kg; DXA vs. Ucrea, -2.62 +/- 8.02 and 2.00 +/- 10.0 kg; DXA vs. BIA, -7.90 +/- 8.92 and -7.85 +/- 2.32 kg. The results obtained with BIA were significantly different from the other methods for both control subjects and IDDM patients. In conclusion, DXA scanning is a precise and valid method for estimation of fat-free mass in IDDM patients.

AB - Data on body composition in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) are scarce. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning has proved useful for this purpose in other groups of patients. We tested the validity of the DXA scanner for the determination of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass in IDDM patients and control subjects, as compared to other reference methods, i.e. total body potassium by 40K whole body counting (TBK), total body water by tritiated water (TBW), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and 24-h urinary creatinine excretion (Ucrea). A total of 13 healthy controls, 5 males and 8 females, aged 34.2 years +/- SD 10.4, and 11 IDDM patients, 5 males, 6 females, aged 28.1 years +/- 7.3, diabetes duration 4.2 +/- 2.9 (1.0-9.9), were examined. The patients had no long-term diabetic complications and they had normal ophthalmoscopy and urine albumin excretion. The agreement between FFM estimated by DXA and the other methods, expressed as mean difference +/- 2 SD was; for DXA vs. TBK, 0.09 +/- 6.26 and 0.50 +/- 5.26 kg for controls and IDDM patients respectively; DXA vs. TBW, -2.07 +/- 2.56 and -1.07 +/- 4.58 kg; DXA vs. Ucrea, -2.62 +/- 8.02 and 2.00 +/- 10.0 kg; DXA vs. BIA, -7.90 +/- 8.92 and -7.85 +/- 2.32 kg. The results obtained with BIA were significantly different from the other methods for both control subjects and IDDM patients. In conclusion, DXA scanning is a precise and valid method for estimation of fat-free mass in IDDM patients.

KW - Absorptiometry, Photon

KW - Adult

KW - Albuminuria

KW - Body Composition

KW - Body Mass Index

KW - Body Water

KW - Body Weight

KW - Creatinine

KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

KW - Electric Impedance

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Potassium

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 8903839

VL - 55

SP - 691

EP - 699

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. Supplement

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. Supplement

SN - 0085-591X

IS - 8

ER -