Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting. / Malcolm-Davies, Jane Anne; Gilbert, Ruth; Lervad, Susanne.

In: Archaeological Textiles Review, Vol. 60, 2018, p. 10-24.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Malcolm-Davies, JA, Gilbert, R & Lervad, S 2018, 'Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting', Archaeological Textiles Review, vol. 60, pp. 10-24.

APA

Malcolm-Davies, J. A., Gilbert, R., & Lervad, S. (2018). Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting. Archaeological Textiles Review, 60, 10-24.

Vancouver

Malcolm-Davies JA, Gilbert R, Lervad S. Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting. Archaeological Textiles Review. 2018;60:10-24.

Author

Malcolm-Davies, Jane Anne ; Gilbert, Ruth ; Lervad, Susanne. / Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting. In: Archaeological Textiles Review. 2018 ; Vol. 60. pp. 10-24.

Bibtex

@article{6a9e6369044b4f9ab6072cbc95808080,
title = "Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting",
abstract = "Evidence for the development of knitting as a craft and industry is not as readily available as it is for weaving. The reasons for this include the relative scarcity of the archaeological and historical material, its inaccessibility due to incomplete or inaccurate cataloguing, and the lack of agreed terminology for a scholarly discussion. This paper proposes a vocabulary based on English terminology used in textile analysis, in craftwork and in the mechanised knitting industry today. A recording protocol is required to provide reliable descriptive detail for those who cannot view the items for themselves and to offer a sound foundation upon which later observers can build with further insights. This paper aims at a protocol for recording knitted items which may be used as a guideline by experts and non-experts in textile analysis of knitwork. It cautions against deductions as to methods of construction without credible evidence and calls for more discussion of appropriate terms in English and other languages.",
author = "Malcolm-Davies, {Jane Anne} and Ruth Gilbert and Susanne Lervad",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "10--24",
journal = "Archaeological Textiles Newsletter",
issn = "0169-7331",
publisher = "Norwegian University of Science and Technology",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unravelling the confusions: Defining concepts to record archaeological and historical evidence for knitting

AU - Malcolm-Davies, Jane Anne

AU - Gilbert, Ruth

AU - Lervad, Susanne

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Evidence for the development of knitting as a craft and industry is not as readily available as it is for weaving. The reasons for this include the relative scarcity of the archaeological and historical material, its inaccessibility due to incomplete or inaccurate cataloguing, and the lack of agreed terminology for a scholarly discussion. This paper proposes a vocabulary based on English terminology used in textile analysis, in craftwork and in the mechanised knitting industry today. A recording protocol is required to provide reliable descriptive detail for those who cannot view the items for themselves and to offer a sound foundation upon which later observers can build with further insights. This paper aims at a protocol for recording knitted items which may be used as a guideline by experts and non-experts in textile analysis of knitwork. It cautions against deductions as to methods of construction without credible evidence and calls for more discussion of appropriate terms in English and other languages.

AB - Evidence for the development of knitting as a craft and industry is not as readily available as it is for weaving. The reasons for this include the relative scarcity of the archaeological and historical material, its inaccessibility due to incomplete or inaccurate cataloguing, and the lack of agreed terminology for a scholarly discussion. This paper proposes a vocabulary based on English terminology used in textile analysis, in craftwork and in the mechanised knitting industry today. A recording protocol is required to provide reliable descriptive detail for those who cannot view the items for themselves and to offer a sound foundation upon which later observers can build with further insights. This paper aims at a protocol for recording knitted items which may be used as a guideline by experts and non-experts in textile analysis of knitwork. It cautions against deductions as to methods of construction without credible evidence and calls for more discussion of appropriate terms in English and other languages.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 60

SP - 10

EP - 24

JO - Archaeological Textiles Newsletter

JF - Archaeological Textiles Newsletter

SN - 0169-7331

ER -

ID: 213170863