The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility. / Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg; Lykke, Kirsten.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 21, No. 1, 126, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Stokholm, JR & Lykke, K 2020, 'The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility', BMC Family Practice, vol. 21, no. 1, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3

APA

Stokholm, J. R., & Lykke, K. (2020). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), [126]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3

Vancouver

Stokholm JR, Lykke K. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility. BMC Family Practice. 2020;21(1). 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3

Author

Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg ; Lykke, Kirsten. / The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility. In: BMC Family Practice. 2020 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{144c9d4d557b4f98876ba0bdaf10df2f,
title = "The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility",
abstract = "Background: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children's mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children's mental health in general practice. Methods: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child's mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. Results: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. Conclusions: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child's mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. Trial registration: Not relevant. ",
keywords = "Mental health, Preschool children, Preventive health service, Psychopathology, general practitioner/ physicians, primary care, Questionnaire, Routine childcare visits, Strength and difficulties questionnaire / SDQ, Well-child visit",
author = "Stokholm, {Julie Ravneberg} and Kirsten Lykke",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "B M C Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - A qualitative study of feasibility

AU - Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg

AU - Lykke, Kirsten

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children's mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children's mental health in general practice. Methods: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child's mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. Results: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. Conclusions: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child's mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. Trial registration: Not relevant.

AB - Background: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children's mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children's mental health in general practice. Methods: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child's mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. Results: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. Conclusions: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child's mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. Trial registration: Not relevant.

KW - Mental health

KW - Preschool children

KW - Preventive health service

KW - Psychopathology, general practitioner/ physicians, primary care

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Routine childcare visits

KW - Strength and difficulties questionnaire / SDQ

KW - Well-child visit

U2 - 10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3

DO - 10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32611309

AN - SCOPUS:85087459958

VL - 21

JO - B M C Family Practice

JF - B M C Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

IS - 1

M1 - 126

ER -

ID: 245077008