The dark core of personality

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The dark core of personality. / Moshagen, Morten; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 125, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 656-688.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Moshagen, M, Hilbig, BE & Zettler, I 2018, 'The dark core of personality', Psychological Review, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 656-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

APA

Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

Vancouver

Moshagen M, Hilbig BE, Zettler I. The dark core of personality. Psychological Review. 2018 Oct 1;125(5):656-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

Author

Moshagen, Morten ; Hilbig, Benjamin E. ; Zettler, Ingo. / The dark core of personality. In: Psychological Review. 2018 ; Vol. 125, No. 5. pp. 656-688.

Bibtex

@article{3c80014054194258a7ceecbe20236e5b,
title = "The dark core of personality",
abstract = "Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed {"}dark traits{"}) have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality (D). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one's individual utility- disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others-accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies (N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included.",
keywords = "Big Five, D factor, Dark traits, Dark triad, HEXACO",
author = "Morten Moshagen and Hilbig, {Benjamin E.} and Ingo Zettler",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rev0000111",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "656--688",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dark core of personality

AU - Moshagen, Morten

AU - Hilbig, Benjamin E.

AU - Zettler, Ingo

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed "dark traits") have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality (D). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one's individual utility- disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others-accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies (N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included.

AB - Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed "dark traits") have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality (D). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one's individual utility- disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others-accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies (N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included.

KW - Big Five

KW - D factor

KW - Dark traits

KW - Dark triad

KW - HEXACO

U2 - 10.1037/rev0000111

DO - 10.1037/rev0000111

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29999338

AN - SCOPUS:85049783689

VL - 125

SP - 656

EP - 688

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 216972415