The comparative utility of oral swabs and probang samples for detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in cattle and pigs
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The comparative utility of oral swabs and probang samples for detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in cattle and pigs. / Stenfeldt, Carolina; Lohse, Louise; Belsham, Graham J.
In: Veterinary Microbiology, Vol. 162, No. 2-4, 23.03.2013, p. 330-337.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The comparative utility of oral swabs and probang samples for detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in cattle and pigs
AU - Stenfeldt, Carolina
AU - Lohse, Louise
AU - Belsham, Graham J
N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/3/23
Y1 - 2013/3/23
N2 - Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) RNA was measured using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays in oral swab and probang samples collected from cattle and pigs during experimental infections with serotype O FMDV. During acute infection, FMDV RNA was measurable in oral swabs as well as in probang samples from both species. FMDV RNA could be detected in oral swabs and probang samples from a time point corresponding to the onset of viremia in directly inoculated animals, whereas animals which were infected through contact exposure had low levels of FMDV RNA in oral swabs before viral RNA could be measured in serum. Analysis of samples collected from cattle persistently infected with FMDV showed that it was not possible to detect FMDV RNA in oral swabs harvested beyond 10 days post infection (dpi), despite the presence of FMDV RNA in probang samples that had been collected as late as 35 dpi. An interesting feature of the persistent infection in the cattle was the apparent decline in the level of FMDV RNA in probang samples after the acute phase of infection, which was followed by a marked rise again (in all the carrier animals) by 28 dpi. Results from this study indicate that qRT-PCR analysis of oral swabs is a useful approach in order to achieve a time efficient and reliable initial diagnosis of acute FMD in cattle and pigs, whereas probang sampling is essential for the detection of cattle that are persistently infected "carriers" of FMDV.
AB - Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) RNA was measured using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays in oral swab and probang samples collected from cattle and pigs during experimental infections with serotype O FMDV. During acute infection, FMDV RNA was measurable in oral swabs as well as in probang samples from both species. FMDV RNA could be detected in oral swabs and probang samples from a time point corresponding to the onset of viremia in directly inoculated animals, whereas animals which were infected through contact exposure had low levels of FMDV RNA in oral swabs before viral RNA could be measured in serum. Analysis of samples collected from cattle persistently infected with FMDV showed that it was not possible to detect FMDV RNA in oral swabs harvested beyond 10 days post infection (dpi), despite the presence of FMDV RNA in probang samples that had been collected as late as 35 dpi. An interesting feature of the persistent infection in the cattle was the apparent decline in the level of FMDV RNA in probang samples after the acute phase of infection, which was followed by a marked rise again (in all the carrier animals) by 28 dpi. Results from this study indicate that qRT-PCR analysis of oral swabs is a useful approach in order to achieve a time efficient and reliable initial diagnosis of acute FMD in cattle and pigs, whereas probang sampling is essential for the detection of cattle that are persistently infected "carriers" of FMDV.
KW - Animals
KW - Carrier State/diagnosis
KW - Cattle
KW - Cattle Diseases/diagnosis
KW - Foot-and-Mouth Disease/blood
KW - Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics
KW - RNA, Viral/analysis
KW - Sus scrofa
KW - Swine
KW - Swine Diseases/diagnosis
KW - Viremia/diagnosis
U2 - 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.09.008
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23022683
VL - 162
SP - 330
EP - 337
JO - Veterinary Microbiology
JF - Veterinary Microbiology
SN - 0378-1135
IS - 2-4
ER -
ID: 257916937