Testing for Drug-Related Infectious Diseases and Determinants among People Who Use Drugs in a Low-Resource Setting: A Respondent-Driven Cross-Sectional Survey

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 291 KB, PDF document

  • Samuel Lazarus Likindikoki
  • Elia J. Mmbaga
  • Mucho Mizinduko
  • Mwijage Alexander
  • Lisa Adams
  • Robert Jr Horsburgh Jr
  • Kare Moen
  • Germana Leyna
  • Lange, Theis
  • Britt P. Tersbol
  • Melkizedeck Leshabari
  • Meyrowitsch, Dan Wolf

(1) Background: There is a dearth of data on the levels and determinants of testing for drug-related infectious diseases among people who use drugs (PWUD). We assessed the proportions and determinants of testing for drug-related infectious diseases to inform ongoing interventions for PWUD. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 599 PWUD was conducted in Dar es Salaam and Tanga between January and February 2019. Data were collected through a researcher-administered questionnaire using handheld tablets. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent testing determinants for drug-related infectious diseases. (3) Results: A majority (98.0%) of participants were males, with a mean age of 36.8 (SD = 7.8) years. 75.0%, 40.6%, 38.6%, and 8.2% reported having ever tested for HIV, tuberculosis (TB), sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and viral hepatitis, respectively. The likelihood of HIV testing was higher among those living with someone (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.09-4.68) compared with those who were homeless and perceived treatment was appropriate (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.05-4.46), but was lower among those who experienced mild to moderate (AOR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.95) and severe internalized stigma (AOR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.94) compared with those reporting no internalized stigma, and among those who experienced financial difficulties resulting from spending on health care services (AOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.89). Perception of treatment appropriateness (AOR = 2.29, 96% CI: 1.10-5.06) and severe enacted stigma (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.06-3.42) were associated with increased odds of TB testing. The odds of STIs testing increased among those who were married (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.45-3.72) compared with those who were single and those who had experienced mild (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.28-4.53) or severe (AOR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.99-23.83) sexual violence, compared with those who had not experienced sexual violence. However, the odds decreased among those who had been remanded in the past month (AOR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.95) compared with those who were not remanded and among those who had financial difficulties resulting from spending on health care services (AOR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.94). The likelihood of testing for viral hepatitis testing increased among those who had heard about the comprehensive HIV intervention package (CHIP) (AOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.40-4.94); however, it decreased among those who had financial difficulties resulting from spending on health care services (AOR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.92). (4) Conclusions: Except for HIV, PWUD had undergone limited testing for drug-related infectious diseases. The study findings highlight some factors influencing testing for the selected infectious diseases investigated, which should be targeted for tailored interventions to improve diagnosis and treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number213
JournalTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Volume7
Issue number9
Number of pages16
ISSN2414-6366
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • infectious diseases, HIV, TB, STIs, viral hepatitis, testing, PWUD, low-resource setting, Tanzania, INJECT DRUGS, HEPATITIS-B, TUBERCULOSIS, VIRUS

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 320921227