Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. / Knai, Cécile; Petticrew, Mark; Mays, Nicholas; Capewell, Simon; Cassidy, Rebecca; Cummins, Steven; Eastmure, Elizabeth; Fafard, Patrick; Hawkins, Benjamin; Jensen, Jørgen Dejgård; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Mwatsama, Modi; Orford, Jim; Weishaar, Heide.

In: The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2018, p. 472-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Knai, C, Petticrew, M, Mays, N, Capewell, S, Cassidy, R, Cummins, S, Eastmure, E, Fafard, P, Hawkins, B, Jensen, JD, Katikireddi, SV, Mwatsama, M, Orford, J & Weishaar, H 2018, 'Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health', The Milbank Quarterly, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 472-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12339

APA

Knai, C., Petticrew, M., Mays, N., Capewell, S., Cassidy, R., Cummins, S., Eastmure, E., Fafard, P., Hawkins, B., Jensen, J. D., Katikireddi, S. V., Mwatsama, M., Orford, J., & Weishaar, H. (2018). Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. The Milbank Quarterly, 96(3), 472-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12339

Vancouver

Knai C, Petticrew M, Mays N, Capewell S, Cassidy R, Cummins S et al. Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. The Milbank Quarterly. 2018;96(3):472-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12339

Author

Knai, Cécile ; Petticrew, Mark ; Mays, Nicholas ; Capewell, Simon ; Cassidy, Rebecca ; Cummins, Steven ; Eastmure, Elizabeth ; Fafard, Patrick ; Hawkins, Benjamin ; Jensen, Jørgen Dejgård ; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Mwatsama, Modi ; Orford, Jim ; Weishaar, Heide. / Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. In: The Milbank Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 96, No. 3. pp. 472-498.

Bibtex

@article{084cd3475f34422383e68f9a420f932c,
title = "Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health",
abstract = "Policy Points: Worldwide, more than 70% of all deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), nearly half of which are premature and apply to individuals of working age. Although such deaths are largely preventable, effective solutions continue to elude the public health community. One reason is the considerable influence of the “commercial determinants of health”: NCDs are the product of a system that includes powerful corporate actors, who are often involved in public health policymaking. This article shows how a complex systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs, and it explains how this can help with (1) conceptualizing the problem of NCDs and (2) developing effective policy interventions. Context: The high burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) is politically salient and eminently preventable. However, effective solutions largely continue to elude the public health community. Two pressing issues heighten this challenge: the first is the public health community's narrow approach to addressing NCDs, and the second is the involvement of corporate actors in policymaking. While NCDs are often conceptualized in terms of individual-level risk factors, we argue that they should be reframed as products of a complex system. This article explores the value of a systems approach to understanding NCDs as an emergent property of a complex system, with a focus on commercial actors. Methods: Drawing on Donella Meadows's systems thinking framework, this article examines how a systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs and, specifically, how unhealthy commodity industries influence public health policy. Findings: Unhealthy commodity industries actively design and shape the NCD policy system, intervene at different levels of the system to gain agency over policy and politics, and legitimize their presence in public health policy decisions. Conclusions: It should be possible to apply the principles of systems thinking to other complex public health issues, not just NCDs. Such an approach should be tested and refined for other complex public health challenges.",
keywords = "noncommunicable diseases, systems thinking, unhealthy commodity industries",
author = "C{\'e}cile Knai and Mark Petticrew and Nicholas Mays and Simon Capewell and Rebecca Cassidy and Steven Cummins and Elizabeth Eastmure and Patrick Fafard and Benjamin Hawkins and Jensen, {J{\o}rgen Dejg{\aa}rd} and Katikireddi, {Srinivasa Vittal} and Modi Mwatsama and Jim Orford and Heide Weishaar",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/1468-0009.12339",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "472--498",
journal = "The Milbank Quarterly",
issn = "0887-378X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health

AU - Knai, Cécile

AU - Petticrew, Mark

AU - Mays, Nicholas

AU - Capewell, Simon

AU - Cassidy, Rebecca

AU - Cummins, Steven

AU - Eastmure, Elizabeth

AU - Fafard, Patrick

AU - Hawkins, Benjamin

AU - Jensen, Jørgen Dejgård

AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal

AU - Mwatsama, Modi

AU - Orford, Jim

AU - Weishaar, Heide

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Policy Points: Worldwide, more than 70% of all deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), nearly half of which are premature and apply to individuals of working age. Although such deaths are largely preventable, effective solutions continue to elude the public health community. One reason is the considerable influence of the “commercial determinants of health”: NCDs are the product of a system that includes powerful corporate actors, who are often involved in public health policymaking. This article shows how a complex systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs, and it explains how this can help with (1) conceptualizing the problem of NCDs and (2) developing effective policy interventions. Context: The high burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) is politically salient and eminently preventable. However, effective solutions largely continue to elude the public health community. Two pressing issues heighten this challenge: the first is the public health community's narrow approach to addressing NCDs, and the second is the involvement of corporate actors in policymaking. While NCDs are often conceptualized in terms of individual-level risk factors, we argue that they should be reframed as products of a complex system. This article explores the value of a systems approach to understanding NCDs as an emergent property of a complex system, with a focus on commercial actors. Methods: Drawing on Donella Meadows's systems thinking framework, this article examines how a systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs and, specifically, how unhealthy commodity industries influence public health policy. Findings: Unhealthy commodity industries actively design and shape the NCD policy system, intervene at different levels of the system to gain agency over policy and politics, and legitimize their presence in public health policy decisions. Conclusions: It should be possible to apply the principles of systems thinking to other complex public health issues, not just NCDs. Such an approach should be tested and refined for other complex public health challenges.

AB - Policy Points: Worldwide, more than 70% of all deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), nearly half of which are premature and apply to individuals of working age. Although such deaths are largely preventable, effective solutions continue to elude the public health community. One reason is the considerable influence of the “commercial determinants of health”: NCDs are the product of a system that includes powerful corporate actors, who are often involved in public health policymaking. This article shows how a complex systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs, and it explains how this can help with (1) conceptualizing the problem of NCDs and (2) developing effective policy interventions. Context: The high burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) is politically salient and eminently preventable. However, effective solutions largely continue to elude the public health community. Two pressing issues heighten this challenge: the first is the public health community's narrow approach to addressing NCDs, and the second is the involvement of corporate actors in policymaking. While NCDs are often conceptualized in terms of individual-level risk factors, we argue that they should be reframed as products of a complex system. This article explores the value of a systems approach to understanding NCDs as an emergent property of a complex system, with a focus on commercial actors. Methods: Drawing on Donella Meadows's systems thinking framework, this article examines how a systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs and, specifically, how unhealthy commodity industries influence public health policy. Findings: Unhealthy commodity industries actively design and shape the NCD policy system, intervene at different levels of the system to gain agency over policy and politics, and legitimize their presence in public health policy decisions. Conclusions: It should be possible to apply the principles of systems thinking to other complex public health issues, not just NCDs. Such an approach should be tested and refined for other complex public health challenges.

KW - noncommunicable diseases

KW - systems thinking

KW - unhealthy commodity industries

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0009.12339

DO - 10.1111/1468-0009.12339

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30277610

AN - SCOPUS:85053041182

VL - 96

SP - 472

EP - 498

JO - The Milbank Quarterly

JF - The Milbank Quarterly

SN - 0887-378X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 203086942