Second-Order Political Thinking: Compromise versus Populism
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Accepted author manuscript, 467 KB, PDF document
The literature often mentions that populism is in conflict with the politics of compromise. However, the opposition remains vague and undertheorized. This article confronts populism and compromise in a novel way by analyzing them as types of second-order political thinking and ideologies of democracy. Second-order political thinking provides a set of ideas and concepts that frames and regulates how we relate to others in politics, and how we make political decisions for, with, or against them. By contrasting populism and compromise as types of second-order political thinking, we will better be able to understand each and normatively compare them. Thus, we see that (1) compromise is inherently most attractive as second-order political thinking, and (2) populism fails as an ideology of democracy, because it cannot explain the meaning and value of the democratic system as a set of authoritative institutions and procedures.
|Number of pages
|Published - 12 Jul 2021
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available