School performance in Danish children exposed to maternal type 1 diabetes in utero: A nationwide retrospective cohort study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Standard
School performance in Danish children exposed to maternal type 1 diabetes in utero : A nationwide retrospective cohort study. / Spangmose, Anne Lærke; Skipper, Niels; Knorr, Sine; Gundersen, Tina Wullum; Jensen, Rikke Beck; Damm, Peter; Mortensen, Erik Lykke; Pinborg, Anja; Svensson, Jannet; Clausen, Tine.
In: PLoS Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 4 April, e1003977, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - School performance in Danish children exposed to maternal type 1 diabetes in utero
T2 - A nationwide retrospective cohort study
AU - Spangmose, Anne Lærke
AU - Skipper, Niels
AU - Knorr, Sine
AU - Gundersen, Tina Wullum
AU - Jensen, Rikke Beck
AU - Damm, Peter
AU - Mortensen, Erik Lykke
AU - Pinborg, Anja
AU - Svensson, Jannet
AU - Clausen, Tine
N1 - Erratum: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004021 Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Spangmose et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background Conflicting results have been reported concerning possible adverse effects on the cognitive function of offspring of mothers with type 1 diabetes (O-mT1D). Previous studies have included offspring of parents from the background population (O-BP), but not offspring of fathers with type 1 diabetes (O-fT1D) as the unexposed reference group. Methods and findings This is: a population-based retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016. Nationally stan- dardized school test scores (range, 1 to 100) were obtained for public school grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 in O-mT1D and compared with those in O-fT1D and O-BP. Of the 622,073 included children, 2,144 were O-mT1D, and 3,474 were O-fT1D. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare outcomes, including the covariates offspring with type 1 diabetes, parity, number of siblings, offspring sex, smoking during pregnancy, parental age, and socioeconomic factors. Mean test scores were 54.2 (standard deviation, SD 24.8) in OmT1D, 54.4 (SD 24.8) in O-fT1D, and 56.4 (SD 24.7) in O-BP. In adjusted analyses, the mean differences in test scores were −1.59 (95% CI −2.48 to −0.71, p < 0.001) between OmT1D and O-BP and −0.78 (95% CI −1.48 to −0.08, p = 0.03) between O-fT1D and O-BP. No significant difference in the adjusted mean test scores was found between O-mT1D and O-fT1D (p = 0.16). The study’s limitation was no access to measures of glycemic control during pregnancy. Conclusions O-mT1D achieved lower test scores than O-BP but similar test scores compared with OfT1D. Glycemic control during pregnancy is essential to prevent various adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. However, the present study reduces previous concerns regarding adverse effects of in utero hyperglycemia on offspring cognitive function.
AB - Background Conflicting results have been reported concerning possible adverse effects on the cognitive function of offspring of mothers with type 1 diabetes (O-mT1D). Previous studies have included offspring of parents from the background population (O-BP), but not offspring of fathers with type 1 diabetes (O-fT1D) as the unexposed reference group. Methods and findings This is: a population-based retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016. Nationally stan- dardized school test scores (range, 1 to 100) were obtained for public school grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 in O-mT1D and compared with those in O-fT1D and O-BP. Of the 622,073 included children, 2,144 were O-mT1D, and 3,474 were O-fT1D. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare outcomes, including the covariates offspring with type 1 diabetes, parity, number of siblings, offspring sex, smoking during pregnancy, parental age, and socioeconomic factors. Mean test scores were 54.2 (standard deviation, SD 24.8) in OmT1D, 54.4 (SD 24.8) in O-fT1D, and 56.4 (SD 24.7) in O-BP. In adjusted analyses, the mean differences in test scores were −1.59 (95% CI −2.48 to −0.71, p < 0.001) between OmT1D and O-BP and −0.78 (95% CI −1.48 to −0.08, p = 0.03) between O-fT1D and O-BP. No significant difference in the adjusted mean test scores was found between O-mT1D and O-fT1D (p = 0.16). The study’s limitation was no access to measures of glycemic control during pregnancy. Conclusions O-mT1D achieved lower test scores than O-BP but similar test scores compared with OfT1D. Glycemic control during pregnancy is essential to prevent various adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. However, the present study reduces previous concerns regarding adverse effects of in utero hyperglycemia on offspring cognitive function.
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003977
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003977
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35472047
AN - SCOPUS:85128923342
VL - 19
JO - P L o S Medicine (Online)
JF - P L o S Medicine (Online)
SN - 1549-1277
IS - 4 April
M1 - e1003977
ER -
ID: 306829852