Register-based studies of cancer screening effects
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Register-based studies of cancer screening effects. / Von Euler-Chelpin, My; Lynge, Elsebeth; Rebolj, Matejka.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. Supplement, Vol. 39, No. 7 Suppl, 2011, p. 158-164.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Register-based studies of cancer screening effects
AU - Von Euler-Chelpin, My
AU - Lynge, Elsebeth
AU - Rebolj, Matejka
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - INTRODUCTION: There are two organised cancer screening programmes in Denmark, against cervical and breast cancers. The aim with this study was to give an overview of the available register-based research regarding these two programmes, to demonstrate the usefulness of data from the national registers. RESEARCH TOPICS: The register-based studies on cancer screening in Denmark could be grouped into research concerning effectiveness, in terms of mortality and incidence reduction, short-term indicators, e.g. in relation to recommended quality assurance indicators, and side effects, e.g. as false-positive results and overdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that registers have proven to be a valuable tool in evaluating the effects of ongoing screening activities. As they cannot be systematically used to test new screening technologies, register-based studies should not be seen as an alternative to randomised controlled trials, but as a supplement.
AB - INTRODUCTION: There are two organised cancer screening programmes in Denmark, against cervical and breast cancers. The aim with this study was to give an overview of the available register-based research regarding these two programmes, to demonstrate the usefulness of data from the national registers. RESEARCH TOPICS: The register-based studies on cancer screening in Denmark could be grouped into research concerning effectiveness, in terms of mortality and incidence reduction, short-term indicators, e.g. in relation to recommended quality assurance indicators, and side effects, e.g. as false-positive results and overdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that registers have proven to be a valuable tool in evaluating the effects of ongoing screening activities. As they cannot be systematically used to test new screening technologies, register-based studies should not be seen as an alternative to randomised controlled trials, but as a supplement.
KW - Breast Neoplasms
KW - Denmark
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Mammography
KW - Mass Screening
KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
KW - Program Evaluation
KW - Registries
KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
KW - Vaginal Smears
U2 - 10.1177/1403494811401479
DO - 10.1177/1403494811401479
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 21775376
VL - 39
SP - 158
EP - 164
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Supplement
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Supplement
SN - 1403-4956
IS - 7 Suppl
ER -
ID: 38276721