Standard
Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest. / Pisinger, Charlotta.
In:
Preventive Medicine, Vol. 85, 2016, p. 115.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
Pisinger, C 2016, '
Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest',
Preventive Medicine, vol. 85, pp. 115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025
APA
Pisinger, C. (2016).
Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest.
Preventive Medicine,
85, 115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025
Vancouver
Pisinger C.
Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest.
Preventive Medicine. 2016;85:115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025
Author
Pisinger, Charlotta. / Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest. In: Preventive Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 85. pp. 115.
Bibtex
@article{ea74dd7e5c33472ba608d1a1449790a3,
title = "Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest",
keywords = "Electronic cigarettes, Conflict of interest",
author = "Charlotta Pisinger",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "115",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Elsevier",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reading the conflict of interest statement is as important as reading the result section Response to the letter by Dr. Kosmider: ideology versus evidence: investigating the claim that the literature on e-cigarettes is undermined by material conflict of interest
AU - Pisinger, Charlotta
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
KW - Electronic cigarettes
KW - Conflict of interest
U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.025
M3 - Letter
VL - 85
SP - 115
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
SN - 0091-7435
ER -