Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography. / Di Ianni, Tommaso; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov; Villagomez Hoyos, Carlos Armando; Moshavegh, Ramin; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann; Jensen, Jorgen Arendt.

In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Vol. 66, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 453-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Di Ianni, T, Hansen, KL, Villagomez Hoyos, CA, Moshavegh, R, Nielsen, MB & Jensen, JA 2019, 'Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508

APA

Di Ianni, T., Hansen, K. L., Villagomez Hoyos, C. A., Moshavegh, R., Nielsen, M. B., & Jensen, J. A. (2019). Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 66(3), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508

Vancouver

Di Ianni T, Hansen KL, Villagomez Hoyos CA, Moshavegh R, Nielsen MB, Jensen JA. Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2019 Mar;66(3):453-462. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508

Author

Di Ianni, Tommaso ; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov ; Villagomez Hoyos, Carlos Armando ; Moshavegh, Ramin ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann ; Jensen, Jorgen Arendt. / Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography. In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2019 ; Vol. 66, No. 3. pp. 453-462.

Bibtex

@article{acc3686766d94fc087ec87d61942cac1,
title = "Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography",
abstract = "In this study, a vector flow imaging (VFI) method developed for a portable ultrasound scanner was used for estimating peak velocity values and variation in beam-to-flow angle over the cardiac cycle in vivo on healthy volunteers. Peak-systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistive index (RI) measured with VFI were compared to spectral Doppler ultrasonography (SDU). Seventeen healthy volunteers were scanned on the left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs). The standard deviation (SD) of VFI measurements averaged over the cardiac cycle was 7.3% for the magnitude and 3.84° for the angle. Bland-Altman plots showed a positive bias for the PSV measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.31 ms -1 ), and Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.6 ; ). A slightly positive bias was found for EDV and RI measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.08 ms -1 and -0.01 ms -1 , respectively). However, the correlation was low and not significant. The beam-to-flow angle was estimated over the systolic part of the cardiac cycle, and its variations were for all measurements larger than the precision of the angle estimation. The range spanned deviations from -25.2° (-6.0 SD) to 23.7° (4.2 SD) with an average deviation from -15.2° to 9.7°. This can significantly affect PSV values measured by SDU as the beam-to-flow angle is not constant and not aligned with the vessel surface. The study demonstrates that the proposed VFI method can be used in vivo for the measurement of PSV in the CCAs, and that angle variations across the cardiac cycle can lead to significant errors in SDU velocity estimates.",
author = "{Di Ianni}, Tommaso and Hansen, {Kristoffer Lindskov} and {Villagomez Hoyos}, {Carlos Armando} and Ramin Moshavegh and Nielsen, {Michael Bachmann} and Jensen, {Jorgen Arendt}",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "453--462",
journal = "I E E E Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control",
issn = "0885-3010",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Portable Vector Flow Imaging Compared With Spectral Doppler Ultrasonography

AU - Di Ianni, Tommaso

AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov

AU - Villagomez Hoyos, Carlos Armando

AU - Moshavegh, Ramin

AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann

AU - Jensen, Jorgen Arendt

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - In this study, a vector flow imaging (VFI) method developed for a portable ultrasound scanner was used for estimating peak velocity values and variation in beam-to-flow angle over the cardiac cycle in vivo on healthy volunteers. Peak-systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistive index (RI) measured with VFI were compared to spectral Doppler ultrasonography (SDU). Seventeen healthy volunteers were scanned on the left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs). The standard deviation (SD) of VFI measurements averaged over the cardiac cycle was 7.3% for the magnitude and 3.84° for the angle. Bland-Altman plots showed a positive bias for the PSV measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.31 ms -1 ), and Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.6 ; ). A slightly positive bias was found for EDV and RI measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.08 ms -1 and -0.01 ms -1 , respectively). However, the correlation was low and not significant. The beam-to-flow angle was estimated over the systolic part of the cardiac cycle, and its variations were for all measurements larger than the precision of the angle estimation. The range spanned deviations from -25.2° (-6.0 SD) to 23.7° (4.2 SD) with an average deviation from -15.2° to 9.7°. This can significantly affect PSV values measured by SDU as the beam-to-flow angle is not constant and not aligned with the vessel surface. The study demonstrates that the proposed VFI method can be used in vivo for the measurement of PSV in the CCAs, and that angle variations across the cardiac cycle can lead to significant errors in SDU velocity estimates.

AB - In this study, a vector flow imaging (VFI) method developed for a portable ultrasound scanner was used for estimating peak velocity values and variation in beam-to-flow angle over the cardiac cycle in vivo on healthy volunteers. Peak-systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistive index (RI) measured with VFI were compared to spectral Doppler ultrasonography (SDU). Seventeen healthy volunteers were scanned on the left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs). The standard deviation (SD) of VFI measurements averaged over the cardiac cycle was 7.3% for the magnitude and 3.84° for the angle. Bland-Altman plots showed a positive bias for the PSV measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.31 ms -1 ), and Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.6 ; ). A slightly positive bias was found for EDV and RI measured with SDU (mean difference: 0.08 ms -1 and -0.01 ms -1 , respectively). However, the correlation was low and not significant. The beam-to-flow angle was estimated over the systolic part of the cardiac cycle, and its variations were for all measurements larger than the precision of the angle estimation. The range spanned deviations from -25.2° (-6.0 SD) to 23.7° (4.2 SD) with an average deviation from -15.2° to 9.7°. This can significantly affect PSV values measured by SDU as the beam-to-flow angle is not constant and not aligned with the vessel surface. The study demonstrates that the proposed VFI method can be used in vivo for the measurement of PSV in the CCAs, and that angle variations across the cardiac cycle can lead to significant errors in SDU velocity estimates.

U2 - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508

DO - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872508

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30281442

VL - 66

SP - 453

EP - 462

JO - I E E E Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control

JF - I E E E Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control

SN - 0885-3010

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 234705383