Polygenic risk scores: how much do they add?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Polygenic risk scores : how much do they add? / Christoffersen, Mette; Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne.

In: Current Opinion in Lipidology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2021, p. 157-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Christoffersen, M & Tybjærg-Hansen, A 2021, 'Polygenic risk scores: how much do they add?', Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759

APA

Christoffersen, M., & Tybjærg-Hansen, A. (2021). Polygenic risk scores: how much do they add? Current Opinion in Lipidology, 32(3), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759

Vancouver

Christoffersen M, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Polygenic risk scores: how much do they add? Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2021;32(3):157-162. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759

Author

Christoffersen, Mette ; Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne. / Polygenic risk scores : how much do they add?. In: Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2021 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 157-162.

Bibtex

@article{99c2d891e9dc4f6fae00ad7811e7bbce,
title = "Polygenic risk scores: how much do they add?",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current methods to assess genetic risk of familial hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on testing monogenic mutations in well known genes. Here we review recent developments in polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for LDL cholesterol and for CAD, and how they may add to current risk prediction algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: PRSs can identify 10-20 times as many individuals at high polygenic risk compared with monogenic mutations, and PRSs can modulate the effect of a monogenic variant on risk. Current risk factor prediction tools for prevention of CAD incompletely capture polygenic susceptibility, and PRSs may identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit more from lipid-lowering therapy. Finally, PRSs can be quantified already at birth, long before other risk factors used to predict CAD, and before clinical manifestations of disease. SUMMARY: PRSs for CAD may soon be incorporated into clinical practice. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish both analytical and clinical reporting standards for PRSs, and for validating scores in different ethnicities. Thresholds for intervention need to be established for PRSs and integrated into established risk scores. Training programs are needed for clinical staff to learn to communicate polygenic risk in a comprehensive way to the patient.",
author = "Mette Christoffersen and Anne Tybj{\ae}rg-Hansen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "157--162",
journal = "Current Opinion in Lipidology",
issn = "0957-9672",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Polygenic risk scores

T2 - how much do they add?

AU - Christoffersen, Mette

AU - Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current methods to assess genetic risk of familial hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on testing monogenic mutations in well known genes. Here we review recent developments in polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for LDL cholesterol and for CAD, and how they may add to current risk prediction algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: PRSs can identify 10-20 times as many individuals at high polygenic risk compared with monogenic mutations, and PRSs can modulate the effect of a monogenic variant on risk. Current risk factor prediction tools for prevention of CAD incompletely capture polygenic susceptibility, and PRSs may identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit more from lipid-lowering therapy. Finally, PRSs can be quantified already at birth, long before other risk factors used to predict CAD, and before clinical manifestations of disease. SUMMARY: PRSs for CAD may soon be incorporated into clinical practice. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish both analytical and clinical reporting standards for PRSs, and for validating scores in different ethnicities. Thresholds for intervention need to be established for PRSs and integrated into established risk scores. Training programs are needed for clinical staff to learn to communicate polygenic risk in a comprehensive way to the patient.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current methods to assess genetic risk of familial hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on testing monogenic mutations in well known genes. Here we review recent developments in polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for LDL cholesterol and for CAD, and how they may add to current risk prediction algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: PRSs can identify 10-20 times as many individuals at high polygenic risk compared with monogenic mutations, and PRSs can modulate the effect of a monogenic variant on risk. Current risk factor prediction tools for prevention of CAD incompletely capture polygenic susceptibility, and PRSs may identify subgroups of patients who are likely to benefit more from lipid-lowering therapy. Finally, PRSs can be quantified already at birth, long before other risk factors used to predict CAD, and before clinical manifestations of disease. SUMMARY: PRSs for CAD may soon be incorporated into clinical practice. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish both analytical and clinical reporting standards for PRSs, and for validating scores in different ethnicities. Thresholds for intervention need to be established for PRSs and integrated into established risk scores. Training programs are needed for clinical staff to learn to communicate polygenic risk in a comprehensive way to the patient.

U2 - 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759

DO - 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000759

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33900274

AN - SCOPUS:85105760872

VL - 32

SP - 157

EP - 162

JO - Current Opinion in Lipidology

JF - Current Opinion in Lipidology

SN - 0957-9672

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 269608236