Overtreatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Background and purpose - The best treatment for displaced clavicle fractures has been debated for decades. Operative treatment has become more common. However, several randomized trials comparing non-operative and operative treatment have not shown any compelling evidence in favor of surgery. We identified the preferred treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures at public hospitals in 3 countries in Scandinavia. Patients and methods - A purpose-made multiple-choice questionnaire in English was sent to all public hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland. This was addressed to the orthopedic surgeon responsible for treatment of clavicle fractures, and completed questionnaires were obtained from 85 of 118 hospitals. Results - In the 3 countries, 69 of the 85 hospitals that responded would treat displaced clavicle fractures operatively. Clear criteria for treatment allocation were used at 58 of the hospitals, with the remaining 27 using individual assessment in collaboration with the patient. Precontoured locking plates were mostly used, placed either superiorly (64/85) or anteriorly (10/85). Interpretation - Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures are mainly treated operatively in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. This treatment is not supported by compelling evidence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)541-545
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

    Research areas

  • Adult, Bone Plates, Clavicle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Finland, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Ununited, Humans, Incidence, Male, Medical Overuse, Sweden, Treatment Outcome, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk

No data available

ID: 173704968