Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment. / Monrad, H; Grønvall, S; Højgaard, L.

In: Nuclear Medicine Communications, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.1994, p. 47-9.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Monrad, H, Grønvall, S & Højgaard, L 1994, 'Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment', Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47-9.

APA

Monrad, H., Grønvall, S., & Højgaard, L. (1994). Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 15(1), 47-9.

Vancouver

Monrad H, Grønvall S, Højgaard L. Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 1994 Jan;15(1):47-9.

Author

Monrad, H ; Grønvall, S ; Højgaard, L. / Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment. In: Nuclear Medicine Communications. 1994 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 47-9.

Bibtex

@article{584c705fa14646368b0f3bb4e165d2ec,
title = "Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment",
abstract = "In a prospective, blinded study of 109 patients with cholecystolithiasis, oral cholecystography and 99Tcm-EHIDA cholescintigraphy were compared in terms of reliability for demonstrating cystic duct patency: one of the prerequisites for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment of cholecystolithiasis. Patients with a positive result on one or both tests were regarded as having cystic duct patency. Patients with negative and uncertain result of both tests or one of each were regarded as having no cystic duct patency. Concordance between the two tests was obtained in 93 of 109 patients. The diagnostic reliability of cholescintigraphy and oral cholecystography were 95 and 86%, respectively (P < 0.05), suggesting a more precise determination of gallbladder filling with scintigraphy.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cholecystography, Cholelithiasis, Cystic Duct, Female, Gallbladder, Humans, Lithotripsy, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "H Monrad and S Gr{\o}nvall and L H{\o}jgaard",
year = "1994",
month = jan,
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "47--9",
journal = "Nuclear Medicine Communications",
issn = "0143-3636",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oral cholecystography compared to cholescintigraphy for evaluation of cystic duct patency prior to ESWL treatment

AU - Monrad, H

AU - Grønvall, S

AU - Højgaard, L

PY - 1994/1

Y1 - 1994/1

N2 - In a prospective, blinded study of 109 patients with cholecystolithiasis, oral cholecystography and 99Tcm-EHIDA cholescintigraphy were compared in terms of reliability for demonstrating cystic duct patency: one of the prerequisites for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment of cholecystolithiasis. Patients with a positive result on one or both tests were regarded as having cystic duct patency. Patients with negative and uncertain result of both tests or one of each were regarded as having no cystic duct patency. Concordance between the two tests was obtained in 93 of 109 patients. The diagnostic reliability of cholescintigraphy and oral cholecystography were 95 and 86%, respectively (P < 0.05), suggesting a more precise determination of gallbladder filling with scintigraphy.

AB - In a prospective, blinded study of 109 patients with cholecystolithiasis, oral cholecystography and 99Tcm-EHIDA cholescintigraphy were compared in terms of reliability for demonstrating cystic duct patency: one of the prerequisites for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment of cholecystolithiasis. Patients with a positive result on one or both tests were regarded as having cystic duct patency. Patients with negative and uncertain result of both tests or one of each were regarded as having no cystic duct patency. Concordance between the two tests was obtained in 93 of 109 patients. The diagnostic reliability of cholescintigraphy and oral cholecystography were 95 and 86%, respectively (P < 0.05), suggesting a more precise determination of gallbladder filling with scintigraphy.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cholecystography

KW - Cholelithiasis

KW - Cystic Duct

KW - Female

KW - Gallbladder

KW - Humans

KW - Lithotripsy

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 8152694

VL - 15

SP - 47

EP - 49

JO - Nuclear Medicine Communications

JF - Nuclear Medicine Communications

SN - 0143-3636

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 165884646