Methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity in qualitative research
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
This chapter is based on discussions at a workshop at the Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference in 2019, named How do we know it’s good? A workshop on quality criteria in qualitative social and clinical pharmacy research. After an introduction, the chapter continues with a glance at two different epistemologies. Thereafter, reflections on the challenges that many social pharmacy researchers meet as they come from a natural science background into qualitative research are presented. Specific aspects presented and discussed are: methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity, reflexivity, transparency, checklists, quality criteria, sample size, and saturation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Contemporary research methods in pharmacy and health services |
Editors | Shane P. Desselle, Victoria Garcia-Cárdenas, Claire Anderson, Parisa Aslani, Aleda M.H. Chen, Timothy F. Chen |
Publisher | Academic Press |
Publication date | 2022 |
Edition | 1 |
Pages | 567-574 |
Chapter | 39 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780323918886 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780323914260 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Data saturation, Qualitative research, Quality criteria, Reflexivity, Validity
Research areas
ID: 305865111