Irresponsible parties, responsible voters? Legislative gridlock and collective accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Legislative gridlock is a failure of one of the key functions of government: to pass legislation. Can voters counter such political dysfunction? This paper examines whether and how voters hold politicians accountable for gridlock. We focus on the passage of the government budget, the central task of any legislature, and define a legislature to experience budgetary gridlock if it fails to pass the budget on time. We argue, based on evidence from twenty years of budget enactment data, that voters hold state legislators accountable for budget gridlock in US state governments, with gridlocked incumbents losing their seat more often than incumbents passing budgets on time. Based on established theories of party organization in American politics, we develop three competing theoretical hypotheses to guide our understanding of the observed patterns of retrospective voting. We find strong support for collective electoral accountability with voters punishing incumbent members of state legislature majority parties.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number3
ISSN1932-6203
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2020

Links

ID: 237006188