Interactional functions of invoking procedure in institutional settings

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Documents

When people interact in institutional settings, they frequently invoke procedure. Professionals invoke procedure in order to set or negotiate the frame for the interaction: how it can, will, should or usually does proceed. This paper identifies an instance of invoking procedure (InP) by five criteria: a participant projects a forthcoming action or series of events, and accounts for the projection; the account conveys institutional reasoning (e.g. purpose, conditions) for projecting the forthcoming action(s), and often invokes membership categories, tacit norms and rules. Through a conversation analytic study, we outline a typology on the functions of invoking procedure and what is accomplished in situ. Our analyses show six local functions of InP in institutional talk-in-interaction: (1) announcing procedure, (2) forcing procedure, (3) negotiating procedure, (4) dealing with criticism of procedure, (5) distancing oneself from procedure, and (6) leaving procedure. Overall, invoking procedure appears to be an important feature of institutional interaction used by professionals in order to deal with asymmetries, negotiate procedure and orient to membership competence acquisition and socialization practices.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume44
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1457-1473
Number of pages17
ISSN0378-2166
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2012

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 38325480