Illness management and recovery: one-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in Danish community mental health centers: long-term effects on clinical and personal recovery
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Illness management and recovery : one-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in Danish community mental health centers: long-term effects on clinical and personal recovery. / Jensen, Sofie Bratberg; Dalum, Helle Stentoft; Korsbek, Lisa; Hjorthøj, Carsten; Mikkelsen, John Hagel; Thomsen, Karin; Kistrup, Kristen; Olander, Mette; Lindschou, Jane; Mueser, Kim T; Nordentoft, Merete; Eplov, Lene Falgaard.
In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 19, 65, 2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Illness management and recovery
T2 - one-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in Danish community mental health centers: long-term effects on clinical and personal recovery
AU - Jensen, Sofie Bratberg
AU - Dalum, Helle Stentoft
AU - Korsbek, Lisa
AU - Hjorthøj, Carsten
AU - Mikkelsen, John Hagel
AU - Thomsen, Karin
AU - Kistrup, Kristen
AU - Olander, Mette
AU - Lindschou, Jane
AU - Mueser, Kim T
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
AU - Eplov, Lene Falgaard
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a curriculum-based rehabilitation program for people with severe mental illness with the short-term aim of improving illness self-management and the long-term aim of helping people achieve clinical and personal recovery.METHOD: Participants with schizophrenia or bipolar disorders were recruited from three community mental health centers in the Capital Region of Denmark and randomized to receive group-based IMR and treatment as usual or only the usual intervention. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and the one-year follow-up. Long-term outcomes were categorized according to clinical recovery (i.e., symptoms, global functioning, and hospitalization) and personal recovery (i.e., hope and personal agency). Generalized linear mixed model regression analyses were used in the intent-to-treat analysis.RESULTS: A total of 198 participants were included. No significant differences were found between the IMR and control groups in the Global Assessment of Functioning one year after the intervention, nor were there significant differences in symptoms, number of hospital admissions, emergency room visits, or outpatient treatment.CONCLUSION: The present IMR trial showed no significant effect on clinical and personal recovery at the one-year follow-up. Together with the results of other IMR studies, the present study indicates that the effect of IMR on symptom severity is unclear, which raises questions regarding the impact of IMR on functioning. Additionally, IMR did not affect personal recovery. Although more research is needed, the results indicate that the development of other interventions should be considered to help people with severe mental illness achieve a better level of functioning and personal recovery.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01361698 ).
AB - BACKGROUND: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a curriculum-based rehabilitation program for people with severe mental illness with the short-term aim of improving illness self-management and the long-term aim of helping people achieve clinical and personal recovery.METHOD: Participants with schizophrenia or bipolar disorders were recruited from three community mental health centers in the Capital Region of Denmark and randomized to receive group-based IMR and treatment as usual or only the usual intervention. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and the one-year follow-up. Long-term outcomes were categorized according to clinical recovery (i.e., symptoms, global functioning, and hospitalization) and personal recovery (i.e., hope and personal agency). Generalized linear mixed model regression analyses were used in the intent-to-treat analysis.RESULTS: A total of 198 participants were included. No significant differences were found between the IMR and control groups in the Global Assessment of Functioning one year after the intervention, nor were there significant differences in symptoms, number of hospital admissions, emergency room visits, or outpatient treatment.CONCLUSION: The present IMR trial showed no significant effect on clinical and personal recovery at the one-year follow-up. Together with the results of other IMR studies, the present study indicates that the effect of IMR on symptom severity is unclear, which raises questions regarding the impact of IMR on functioning. Additionally, IMR did not affect personal recovery. Although more research is needed, the results indicate that the development of other interventions should be considered to help people with severe mental illness achieve a better level of functioning and personal recovery.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01361698 ).
U2 - 10.1186/s12888-019-2048-0
DO - 10.1186/s12888-019-2048-0
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30744590
VL - 19
JO - B M C Psychiatry
JF - B M C Psychiatry
SN - 1471-244X
M1 - 65
ER -
ID: 226874112