Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark. / Lam, Janni Uyen Hoa; Lynge, Elsebeth; Njor, Sisse Helle; Rebolj, Matejka.

In: Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), Vol. 54, No. 8, 2015, p. 1136–1143.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lam, JUH, Lynge, E, Njor, SH & Rebolj, M 2015, 'Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark', Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625

APA

Lam, J. U. H., Lynge, E., Njor, S. H., & Rebolj, M. (2015). Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 54(8), 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625

Vancouver

Lam JUH, Lynge E, Njor SH, Rebolj M. Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2015;54(8): 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625

Author

Lam, Janni Uyen Hoa ; Lynge, Elsebeth ; Njor, Sisse Helle ; Rebolj, Matejka. / Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark. In: Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2015 ; Vol. 54, No. 8. pp. 1136–1143.

Bibtex

@article{1713436deb8a422e976d3b95389c95dc,
title = "Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The incidence rates of cervical cancer and the coverage in cervical cancer screening are usually reported by including in the denominator all women from the general population. However, after hysterectomy women are not at risk anymore of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, it makes sense to determine the indicators also for the true at-risk populations. We described the frequency of total hysterectomy in Denmark and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and the screening coverage.MATERIAL AND METHODS: With data from five Danish population-based registries, the incidence rate of cervical cancer and the screening coverage for women aged 23-64 years on 31 December 2010 were calculated with and without adjustments for hysterectomies undertaken for reasons other than cervical cancer. They were calculated as the number of cases divided by 1) the total number of woman-years from the general population; and 2) the at-risk population after exclusion of post-hysterectomy woman-years. Cases were defined as women with cervical cancer (incidence), or as women screened in the recommended interval, with or without adjustment for hysterectomies (coverage).RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In 2010, the all-age prevalence of hysterectomy was estimated at 6%, and ≥ 16% at age ≥ 65. This translated into an overall 6% increase in the incidence rate of cervical cancer, from 12.8 (unadjusted) to 13.5 (adjusted) per 100 000 woman-years. The screening coverage increased from 76% (unadjusted) to 79% (adjusted). In Denmark, hysterectomies do not have a large overall impact on the calculated cancer incidence and screening coverage. Nevertheless, at ≥ 65 years adjusted rates would increase by almost 20% compared to unadjusted rates. This suggests that calculating disease risks per organ-years may have a role in understanding the true burden of the disease in a population at risk of developing that disease.",
author = "Lam, {Janni Uyen Hoa} and Elsebeth Lynge and Njor, {Sisse Helle} and Matejka Rebolj",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = " 1136–1143",
journal = "Acta Odontologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6357",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark

AU - Lam, Janni Uyen Hoa

AU - Lynge, Elsebeth

AU - Njor, Sisse Helle

AU - Rebolj, Matejka

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: The incidence rates of cervical cancer and the coverage in cervical cancer screening are usually reported by including in the denominator all women from the general population. However, after hysterectomy women are not at risk anymore of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, it makes sense to determine the indicators also for the true at-risk populations. We described the frequency of total hysterectomy in Denmark and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and the screening coverage.MATERIAL AND METHODS: With data from five Danish population-based registries, the incidence rate of cervical cancer and the screening coverage for women aged 23-64 years on 31 December 2010 were calculated with and without adjustments for hysterectomies undertaken for reasons other than cervical cancer. They were calculated as the number of cases divided by 1) the total number of woman-years from the general population; and 2) the at-risk population after exclusion of post-hysterectomy woman-years. Cases were defined as women with cervical cancer (incidence), or as women screened in the recommended interval, with or without adjustment for hysterectomies (coverage).RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In 2010, the all-age prevalence of hysterectomy was estimated at 6%, and ≥ 16% at age ≥ 65. This translated into an overall 6% increase in the incidence rate of cervical cancer, from 12.8 (unadjusted) to 13.5 (adjusted) per 100 000 woman-years. The screening coverage increased from 76% (unadjusted) to 79% (adjusted). In Denmark, hysterectomies do not have a large overall impact on the calculated cancer incidence and screening coverage. Nevertheless, at ≥ 65 years adjusted rates would increase by almost 20% compared to unadjusted rates. This suggests that calculating disease risks per organ-years may have a role in understanding the true burden of the disease in a population at risk of developing that disease.

AB - BACKGROUND: The incidence rates of cervical cancer and the coverage in cervical cancer screening are usually reported by including in the denominator all women from the general population. However, after hysterectomy women are not at risk anymore of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, it makes sense to determine the indicators also for the true at-risk populations. We described the frequency of total hysterectomy in Denmark and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and the screening coverage.MATERIAL AND METHODS: With data from five Danish population-based registries, the incidence rate of cervical cancer and the screening coverage for women aged 23-64 years on 31 December 2010 were calculated with and without adjustments for hysterectomies undertaken for reasons other than cervical cancer. They were calculated as the number of cases divided by 1) the total number of woman-years from the general population; and 2) the at-risk population after exclusion of post-hysterectomy woman-years. Cases were defined as women with cervical cancer (incidence), or as women screened in the recommended interval, with or without adjustment for hysterectomies (coverage).RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In 2010, the all-age prevalence of hysterectomy was estimated at 6%, and ≥ 16% at age ≥ 65. This translated into an overall 6% increase in the incidence rate of cervical cancer, from 12.8 (unadjusted) to 13.5 (adjusted) per 100 000 woman-years. The screening coverage increased from 76% (unadjusted) to 79% (adjusted). In Denmark, hysterectomies do not have a large overall impact on the calculated cancer incidence and screening coverage. Nevertheless, at ≥ 65 years adjusted rates would increase by almost 20% compared to unadjusted rates. This suggests that calculating disease risks per organ-years may have a role in understanding the true burden of the disease in a population at risk of developing that disease.

U2 - 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625

DO - 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25800858

VL - 54

SP - 1136

EP - 1143

JO - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6357

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 135651540